Talk:Pakistan and weapons of mass destruction
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Change article title
I do question the importance of "Pakistan is currently the only predominantly Muslim country with nuclear capabilities" would we put "Israel is currently the only predominantly Jewish country with nuclear capabilities"... I think it would be wiser to put this in the context of one of the Pakistani foreign ministers from the 1980's speech about if Pakistan got a nuclear weapon than the whole Muslim world would... that gives it some importance in the light of proliferation... gren
Wouldnt the title Pakistan and its Nuclear detterent be more apropriate? WMD is such a crap term only used to scare people by american news agencies.
- I agree, the topic should be "Pakistan and its Nuclear detterent". That is the official policy of pakistan, and so must Wikipedia respect it.
Added some more info to the chart with respect to correct nomenclature, payload, status, alt. names, and range. Source: PakDef.info and Pakistani Defence.com
[edit] Add more Info
you guys had more information instead of the boring atomic agencies and stuff like that...can we show a bit more effort on this article.Tere naam 04:03, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Non Agreement
There is a lack of agreement between the number of nuclear warheads Iran is said to pocess in this article and in the article List of countries with nuclear weapons.
[edit] Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
- http://www.world-nuclear.org/nb/nb00/nb0025.htm|title=Uranium
- In Pakistan and weapons of mass destruction on Mon Jul 17 15:37:32 2006, 404 Not Found
- In Pakistan and weapons of mass destruction on Thu Jul 27 00:51:15 2006, 404 Not Found
maru (talk) contribs 04:51, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Quote
I can't find (online) any source for the main quote "We will defend our country using any means necessary and build a nuclear capability second to none. We will eat grass for 1000 years, if we have to, but we will get there." - the only time it come up is morrors of wikipedai and a very recnet US spectator article. [1] 160.5.247.8 21:33, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
