Wikipedia:Pages needing attention/Software

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

[edit] Software

Other computing topics: Computer science, Hardware, Internet, Networking, Programming, Software, Misc.
  • ISeries -- This page is basically just a list of features and I think really needs to have the useful parts merged with AS/400 and then be changed back to a redirect to AS/400. See my comments on the talk page for more detail on the matter. I would do it myself, but would like to at least get some other users' input (preferably the main authors of the article) before deleting it. -- uberpenguin 05:35, 2005 Mar 20 (UTC)
  • Object-oriented software engineering -- surely there's more to say here. What are the features of the method? What about Grady Booch and James Rumbaugh? Gazpacho 02:22, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
  • XyMTeX should be expanded. Particularly, the new TeX markup it uses should be described in detail, possibly on XyMTeX markup. --Eequor 17:42, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Similarly with PPCHTeX and PPCHTeX markup. --Eequor 16:08, 23 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Winsock - way out of date, contents c+p from FOLDOC, all external links dead --Kwi 23:34, Mar 24, 2004 (UTC)
  • VSIP - Is this an ad that should go to VfD? Or is it a notable piece of software in its own right? P Ingerson 13:49, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • X Window System protocols and architecture - is not technically complete, is full of holes. In particular, the extension mechanism needs explanation - David Gerard 11:03, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • MicroC/OS-II - Not an encyclopedia article, but rather a text dump of the specification and source codes. - Mike Rosoft 19:34, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • PyMusique - Not a very important article, but could use some sprucing up. --Mrmiscellanious 21:14, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Gutmann method - needs the attention of someone with some time to research the stuff properly and write it more competently. Lacks coherency. Orborde 04:55, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • MilkDrop - Currently a stub, this should be at least the size of AVS, since they are both bundled with Winamp. --pile0nadestalk | contribs 15:31, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Infostructure needs some attention in its description of software, which sounds too technical. JoaoRicardotalk 05:15, 9 January 2006 (UTC)


— Do not add text below this point —

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../p/a/g/Wikipedia%7EPages_needing_attention_Software_2e66.html"