Wikipedia:Pages needing attention/Film

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Contents

[edit] Film

  • Film criticism: The distinction between critics and reviewers isn't as clear cut as this article makes out. Could use a new approach, more history and many more names/sites of active critics. Scarequotes 22:17, Sep 15, 2003 (UTC)
There also appears to be some serious confusion about the difference between film critics and film theorist/analysts. --Chips Critic 21:36, 17 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • Science fiction film — This was a page that received quite a few votes for Page of the Week, but just not enough to pass. Aferwards I tried to build it up with some useful material and information gleaned from a couple of sources. But the history section is lacking in recent developments, and frankly the page needs going over by somebody with a critical eye and more insight into the topic than yours truly. Thank you! — RJH 22:50, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Fictional characters

[edit] Films

  • Home on the Range (movie) - Put information about the characters in this movie as well as the actors and some songs, if you can.
  • The Matrix Revolutions Needs some big time help. Really confusing and stuff. I tred to fix some of it but i can't even begin to clear it up. Kirvett 01:39, 18 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Your comments sound like my reaction to the movie ;-)
Made some editorial changes to the plot outline; will do more later.
  • Fame (movie, TV series, and theme song) - moved to Fame, which was made a disambig page. Individual arts on the movie, Broadway show, TV series, and song need creatin'. +sj+ 00:44, 2004 May 7 (UTC)
These pages have been created. uriah923(talk) 14:58, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Jackass: The Movie is a royal mess. An exhaustive plot summary, with no recognisable formatting. It needs some attention, POV adjustment, and grammar correction... QuantumEleven 15:05, Nov 18, 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Lists

  • List of movies that were financial failures is neither primarily a list nor does it limit itself to money-losing movies. EX: Waterworld, believe it or not, turned a hefty profit for the studio that released it. As it stands, this article should probably be both renamed and edited to be more tightly focused in purpose. Davodd 07:47, Jun 28, 2004 (UTC)
  • Banned films is frighteningly clumsy. 207.69.2.153 20:19, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
I did a huge update of it, and it's ready for lots and lots of contributions! BuddhaInABucket/talk Aug 19 2004
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../p/a/g/Wikipedia%7EPages_needing_attention_Film_a451.html"