Pacific Gas & Electric v. Public Utilities Commission
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Pacific Gas & Electric v. Public Utilities Commission | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supreme Court of the United States |
||||||||
Argued October 8, 1985 Decided February 25, 1986 |
||||||||
|
||||||||
Holding | ||||||||
A private publisher cannot be forced to carry messages inconsistent with his or her views. | ||||||||
Court membership | ||||||||
Chief Justice: Warren E. Burger Associate Justices: William J. Brennan, Byron White, Thurgood Marshall, Harry Blackmun, Lewis Franklin Powell, Jr., William Rehnquist, John Paul Stevens, Sandra Day O'Connor |
||||||||
Case opinions | ||||||||
Majority by: Powell Joined by: Burger, Brennan, O'Connor Concurrence by: Burger Concurrence by: Marshall (in the judgement of the court only) Dissent by: Rehnquist Joined by: White and Stevens (Part I only) Dissent by: Stevens Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. |
Pacific Gas & Electric v. Public Utilities Commission, 475 U.S. 1 (1986), was a court case involving the requirement that San Francisco-based public utility Pacific Gas and Electric Company carry a message supplied by a public interest group in rebuttal to the messages the utility supplied in its newsletter which it placed in its billing envelope.
The rationale used by the regulatory agency was that the space in the billing envelope which could have material added that did not increase postage, belonged to the ratepayers rather than the utility, thus the commission could order the utility to allow other groups to use that space subject to restrictions.
The U.S. Supreme Court found the order of the California Public Utilities Commission requirement to be unconstitutional, as the right to speak includes the right not to carry messages one disagrees with. As the court stated, "the choice to speak includes within it the choice of what not to say."
This is one of the cases which has essentially provided that, with extremely limited exceptions, the essentially absolute right of a publisher to choose not to carry messages it does not agree with.