Talk:OWMC

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article appears to be completely fake. It should be checked... preliminary searches found absolutely no trace of any OWMC. 149.167.215.96 11:08, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

This page itself seems to be the only reference, even if real it is not notable. TheSeer (TalkˑContribs) 01:53, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Have you bothered picking up the Lonely Planet guide on the region? If you haven't, I suggest you do so. It's in the edition I have. — mæstro ^t/c, 02:25, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

And which edition would this be? TheSeer (TalkˑContribs) 02:27, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Looks completely fake, I have checked several guides and the web, and print encyclopedias. Not a trace. TheKhakinator 06:54, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Delete it. Now. I have found no trace. Should be soon nominated for deletion as vandalism. 149.167.214.242 09:52, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Indeed. I have placed it as a proposed deletion, as I have found no trace anywhere either. TheKhakinator 10:49, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/OWMC_club. Based on a search it seems to be a non-notable legitimate club however it was deleted due to it's non-notability. Just setting precedent.

That's about the OWMC club page, about a fake English club. This is about a health club that appears to be completely made up, as I have found no trace anywhere... in print or on the web. TheKhakinator 07:12, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Some links.

Meaning of precedent

Legitmate club

TheSeer (TalkˑContribs) 08:17, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] History

The history of the page has been truncated as I was not the original creator of this article. TheSeer (TalkˑContribs) 01:52, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

You were not. Check your case. — mæstro ^t/c, 02:29, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Oh. But It is me and I definitely didn't create this article. TheSeer 02:30, 22 August 2006 (UTC) (check history)-

And you no longer use the acc. It's irrelevent to this article's factuality. — mæstro ^t/c, 02:32, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

No it isn't relevant. This was merely a notice indicating the article is older and has more edits then the history states. The notability point is in the above segment. Also I believe the history truncation may be related to this: OWMC_(disambiguation). Yes it is much newer then the article but the mere existence could be related to some... thing.

Yeah, that page. It's just vandalism. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by maestrosync (talk • contribs).

[edit] Deletion

This article should NOT have been deleted. The guidelines say that an admin, when deciding whether or not to delete an article proposed for deletion: "Check that the tag has been in place continuously for at least 5 days and no objections have been raised on the talk page."

I'm not sure that the tag was not in place continuously for at least 5 days--I deleted it once, I know--and clearly, I have raised an objection to the deletion on the talk page. — mæstro ^t/c, 08:21, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

The deletion was performed by an administrator who has violated WP:SOCK and WP:BOT. It's a pity his sysop abilities weren't revoked temporarily while the Arbitration committee was investigating. TheSeer (TalkˑContribs) 04:12, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

TheSeer: Never heard of AGF, I see. Did you take a look at my deletion log lately? Hundreds and hundreds of PRODs, because there was a backlog. I'm not perfect, and to me it looked like this talk page had agreed that if there was a notable article-worthy club, it was not about the club that the article was then about.

Maestro, you did indeed unPROD it, but then User:TheKhakinator apparently independently readded it on 23 August, and I deleted it on the 29th... so that was actually six days it was in place. --maru (talk) contribs 04:40, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

We'll soon see. It appears to most to be a strong candidate for deletion. TheKhakinator 10:46, 3 September 2006 (UTC)