Talk:Otley Run
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on 25 January 2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus. An archived record of this discussion can be found here. |
fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 07:41, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
Moved here as it is not a stop on the Otley Run, but may be of interest. (Barry m 22:42, 9 May 2006 (UTC)):-
- Prior to closing in January 2005, The Lounge Cinema located between The Arc and Trio was one of the few cinemas in Britain where it was possible to drink alcoholic drinks whilst watching a film although this applied only to movies with an 18 certificate. Itchy Leeds article on Cinema prior to closure
[edit] Question regarding classification of "Ommitted by the traditionalist Otley Runners"
What is the classification for determining whether a particular pub or bar is avoided by traditionalist Otley Runners. Is it due to pubs that have only been open in the past fifteen years such as the Box and Arc not having as established a history as the likes of the Original Oak and Skyrack or is it the avoidance of contempary style premises. Also considering the Drydock has only been around since 1993 has this been included on the traditionalist list due to not being of a contempary style. Are there any websites detailing rationale for avoidance as it is not traditional? What are peoples comments on this? --Wrh1973 15:31, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
I think it's along the lines of the ones not on Otley Road/Woodhouse Lane/Whatever and the shiney new ones. And by shiney and new I mean the ones that haven't had a long standing (5-10 years +) recognised position on the Otley Run. 82.3.196.17 17:54, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Shotley Run Merge Debate
Shouldn't it just be put under "possible variations" in the Otley Run article? 82.3.196.17 17:54, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Cleanup
This needs serious clean up and sourcing! It reads like a guide which is not for an encyclopedia. TO stay we need alot more on the history and the like and less on the practicalities. Plus plenty more sources please.
Ironically I found this via facebook and was a bit disappointed. This ain't what Wikipedia is for :(
Still I'm ignoring my itchy send to AFD finger for now and just uber tagging the damn thing till someone with more time that me notices :D --Errant Tmorton166(Talk) 23:52, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
