User talk:OtherDave
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Hi there. You've reached my talk page.
gd-0 | Bha Gàidhlig aig seaneairean agus seanmhairean agam. |
As they say down home,
- Chan fhiach cuirm gun a còmhradh. *
- * A feast's no good without talk.
Unfortunately, I can't talk right now. To leave a comment, click here.
- If you're starting the discussion, I'll reply to it here.
- If I left a comment on your talk page, maybe you'll be kind enough to reply to me there.
Thanks. It's easier for me to follow the conversation when it's all in one place.
Hello, OtherDave, and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.
Here are some tips to help you get started:
- To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
- Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
- If you want to post an image but don't know how - check out the Wikipedia:Image tutorial
- If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk or on my user talk page
- You might want to check some open tasks on Wikipedia:Community portal
- Explore, be bold, and, most importantly, have fun!
Good luck! Renata3 18:42, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Congresses
Looks good to me, that will be good stub information for now. The members list is available, we just have to arrange it from other sources. I'm guessing the modern format is better to replace the format on the older congresses. --Golbez 23:09, August 16, 2005 (UTC)
re: WikiProject U.S. Congress
Thanks for the hello, User:OtherDave. Great work you're doing, and it's fantastic to have other people slogging through Congressional articles. Check my note here about capitals. --Markles 17:14, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] anns a' Ghàidhlig
Tha mi gu math, tapadh leat!
Is toigh leam an "template" agad :-) Mendor 06:57, August 18, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use
Thanks for leaving a note on my user page! It's helpful :) Might you be interested in dealing with copyrights on Wiki? We have a huge problem with images... And there is so much to do about it. See, User:Fastfission ceated this WikiProject about fair use (see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Fair_use). You could start from there!
As for my question about fair use, it dealt with a Lithuanian source. It's super cool maps with a university copyright. So I wondered if it would be possible to use those maps under fair use. And it looks like not... But we will see :) Renata3 02:31, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Science collaboration of the week
You voted for Human genome to be improved while it was listed on WP:IDRIVE. This article is now nominated on Wikipedia:Science collaboration of the week. Please consider supporting it with your vote. --Fenice 13:19, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Gd0.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gd0.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}
.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Shyam (T/C) 08:15, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
- Otherdave, I am really sorry for being deletion of the image file. Userboxen are the derivative work of a template. But if you upload it as an image file, then it should have its copyright information. Its really not understood to me, what is the need to upload such kind of files. It can be generated as a template work. I may be wrong, if you think this kind of work really should be there. Thanks, Shyam (T/C) 15:57, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Waulking
You're right, I didn't know that! It's interesting - I wonder how the change occurred? Time for me to go and read up on the clearances again! I'll add that to Waulking song. Thanks for sharing! Oh, and it is my eternal shame that I don't speak Gaelic, so I have to wonder what you said! Ruaraidh-dobson 22:20, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks! I've made some quick changes to Waulking song to reflect the info you gave me. It's not brilliant prose though; I'm not exactly a fantastic writer so any help you can give me would be much appreciated. Ruaraidh-dobson 22:46, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
-
- Excellent! We've got a good article on the go now - I think whisky's in order, to celebrate in the spirit of things! Ruaraidh-dobson 23:41, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, and I just watched the video you sent me. It really makes me want to go and take part in a milling frolic - I'll have to go to Cape Breton some day! Ruaraidh-dobson 23:43, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Hmm... reading various articles (now I'm back looking at traditional Scottish culture) has made me realise how deficient wikipedia's article on Puirt a Beul is. I'm going to look around for information to add, but maybe you know a bit about it? Any help is much appreciated, as always! Ruaraidh-dobson 23:55, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
-
[edit] Congressional session dates
Dates are better formatted the way they had been before you recently edited a few recent Congresses. I know that many of the other Congresses weren't the same, but the way I've copied below is a lot clearer. I suggest that all Ordinal Congress articles be formatted this way:
Example which I think is better (from 106th United States Congress):
Two sessions, roughly paralleling the calendar years 1999 and 2000:
- First Session: January 6, 1999 – November 22, 1999
- Second Session: January 24, 2000 – December 15, 2000
Furthermore, after 1800, mention of the city is pointless as Washington, DC has been the capital since then.
—Markles 21:13, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Logo confusion
Hallo Dave, you are right...The sentence about the logo is the only part which was already in the stub: anyway, shame on myself! Actually, there are several version of the coat of arms of this rione. In another one, the angels stands on a devil who is on the ground. Anyway, I will update the article according to your note.
Many thanks,
alex2006 11:55, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
- Alessandro, no problem. These angels keep dropping their tools and symbols. I just thought I'd make a note about what confused me. I certainly couldn't say which logo was correct. — OtherDave 13:13, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
-
- Personally, I prefer an Angel who slices fish, working as fish monger, to another one who loses his/her time waving a palm branch... ;-) .
- alex2006 13:37, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
-
- The symbols often matter, but at least for human saints (as opposed to angels), carrying a palm branch was a sign of martyrdom. Usually, though, they carry some more specific symbol, like the sword of St. Paul or the gridiron of St. Lawrence. Angels can't be martyrs, though, so I guess in his (her?) case it's just handy to praise God when He walks by.
- A lecturer at Chartres Cathedral told me that you can tell which saints carved on the building are apostles, because their feet are bare. (Isaiah 52:7, "how beautiful on the mountains are the feet of him who brings good tidings.")
- — OtherDave 13:44, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- This is quite interesting. I read the meaning of the palm branch in this case, but I have to check at home where, since I don't remember it anymore. When I'll find it, I will tell you. Thanks for the copyediting, I changed it a little bit, now i think that should be OK. And, BTW, if you appreciated (besides the italo-roman-english) my article, you can read also this one here... ;-)
-
-
-
- ciao and many thanks,
-
-
-
- alex2006 11:00, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
-
Alex, I'm happy to work with the Italo-Roman-English. My knowledge of Italian and Roman is zero, but I can manage English. Please let me know if I seem to get the meaning wrong. (Hey, does this mean I have to work through all the rioni?) — OtherDave 14:09, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- Covering all the rioni? Ehi, it's a great idea, all together they are only 22 (and the historic ones are only fourteen)! It would have been much worse if I had decided to write one article for each roman church (only in the centre there are more than 200 of them), but unfortunately ;-) someone already did it...
- Anyway, back to work ;-). Yes, Augustus demolished part of the Circus, most likely to build the theater of Marcellus. What remained at the end was the square that you can see in the picture representing a small part of the mythical Plastico of the imperial Rome by Gismondi which I put in the article.
- And yes, in the theater were played mostly tragedies and comedies.
- But you MUST visit Rome! If one is interested in art and history, it is definitely the address number one (at least on planet Earth) ;-).
- alex2006 14:44, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Puirt a beul
Thank you; I have no idea why I did that! Ruaraidh-dobson 20:35, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
-
- I don't know - when I did music at school it was always puirt. Then again, I don't know gaelic. Ruaraidh-dobson 22:21, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Parties in Congress
I contacted congress' website about it and they gave me answers. it's something like 5 senators and 20 congressmen. Pellaken 14:27, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Alasdair MacMhaighstir Alasdair
By all means re-write to your hearts content. Pretty much the entire thing was stuck together and translated from a gaelic bio him so its no surprise that it doesnt read as well as it could do. Its good to know somebody else has taken an interest in improving the article. siarach 18:53, 3 December 2006 (UTC)