Talk:Ostwind

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.

This article has been automatically rated as Stub-Class by the Military history WikiProject because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove |auto=yes from the {{WPMILHIST}} template above. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the |class= parameter in the {{WPMILHIST}} template above and removing the stub template from the article.

Why call it "Ostwind (tank)" instead of just "Ostwind"? I think this is the primary Ostwind english readers would look up.

I also removed the note of discrepency. Considering that it's only off by one, and therefore more accurate then pretty much every other figure we have, I don't think it's really all that relevant. Oberiko 22:35, 12 May 2004 (UTC)

I have no objections to just calling it "Ostwind"...and the difference of one tank is indeed small enogh to let it slip by :p Ferkelparade 13:34, 13 May 2004 (UTC)

I am under the impression that this imagecould be considered fair use; but I'm a n00b to edits and not really sure how to go about it all, especially with regards to images. It comes from this site which also has other old pictures of several WWII armor which may be of use. ~Springfinger 21:00 19 Sept 2006