User:Osbus/Editor Review

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is a proposed Wikipedia policy, guideline, or process. The proposal may still be in development, under discussion, or in the process of gathering consensus for adoption. References or links to this page should not describe it as "policy".

Editor Review allows a user to ask to be reviewed by their peers. The aim of a user review is so an editor with a goal in mind (i.e. becoming and admin) can recieve honest feedback on their elegibility. Different questions are posed for each specific goal, and users comment accordingly. This would be similar to how a Peer Review is carried out before a Featured article candidate.

Contents 1 Guidelines 2 Editors Requesting Reviews 3 Editor Review: Admin 4 Editor Review: Mediation Cabalist 5 Editor Review: Arbitrator 6 Editor Review: Bureaucrat 7 Editor Review: Sysop 8 Editor Review: AMA Coordinator 9 Editor Review: Esperanza Advisory Council 10 Sample Editor Review: Admin

[edit] Guidelines

Editors are asked to:

• Only request Editor Review if they have a specific goal in mind.
• Remain civil.
• Refrain from personal attacks.
• Assume Good Faith.

[edit] Editors Requesting Reviews

When asking for a review, editors are asked to add {{Editor-review}} below this text, with new reviews on top. The usage of {{Editor-review}} is fairly simple; it is {{subst:Editor-review|Username|Statement}} (replacing username with your username and statement with a brief statement about yourself). Remember to sign it with ~~~~! Once you have added your template below, please answer the questions for your specific goal.

[edit] Editor Review: Admin

[edit] Editor Review: Mediation Cabalist

[edit] Editor Review: Arbitrator

[edit] Editor Review: Bureaucrat

[edit] Editor Review: Sysop

[edit] Editor Review: AMA Coordinator

[edit] Editor Review: Esperanza Advisory Council

1. What contributions to Esperanza are you particularly proud of?
2. How will you improve Esperanza?
3. In what ways have you strengthened sense of community in Wikipedia?

[edit] Sample Editor Review: Admin

BobBlog (talk • contribs) I have made 100s of edits, especially stub sorting, and I'm wanting to find out ways I can improve my editing before my RfA! Thanks! BobBlog's talk 19:27, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Reviews

• I find Bob a fantastic editor to deal with! However, it would be great to see him on RC patrol at times. Also, some further discussion on talk pages would be good! Computerjoe's talk 19:27, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
• I think that stupid loser should learn to spell! --Rory096 19:49, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Struck for personal attacks, Rory096 blocked indefinitely. Admin Jim 19:49, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Comments

• See this user's edit history with Interiot's tool and edit summary usage

Questions

1. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

   I am proud of my edits to Bill Gates, I removed various incidents of point of view. Also, I am happy with my many stub sorting contributions.

2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

   Nope. I don't do much which would lead to arguement.