Talk:Orton Ceramic Foundation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from http://www.ortonceramic.com/company/history.shtml. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to license this material under the GNU Free Documentation License, and evidence of this has been lodged with the Wikimedia PR department, under OTRS ticket number 2006032810013641. This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia Open Ticket Request System (OTRS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-en at wikimedia dot org. Do not use this template to claim permission.

i represent the copyright holder for this information, please restore the page as it was, I will continue to add information. —This unsigned comment was added by Stuph (talk • contribs) .

I've restored the article and listed it as a possible copyright problem. Please have someone with an email address @ortonceramic.com contact permissions@wikimedia.org (permissions at wikimedia dot org) to confirm that we have permission to release this under the GFDL. Thanks. Stifle 17:25, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

done. thank you. Stuph

[edit]  ?

how long does it take for an article to be restored? Stuph 14:58, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright status

(moved from User talk:Samw: Hi. Was permission for this resolved? I can't find any evidence of it, just that the original contributor (User:Stuph) removed the copyvio notice and replaced the text in question. I'm relisting it as a copyvio in the meantime. Mark83 14:14, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Not that I'm aware of. Thanks for relisting. Samw 00:25, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

I have emailed twice and posted that I represent the copyright holder. it is not copyvio. Stuph 00:55, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Appreciate your patience but copyright processing is apparently a backlogged item at Wikipedia. You can always offer an original rewrite at the subpage and that should be processed much more quickly. I believe I also offered to receive the copyright release in the absence of the one of the admins receiving and processing it. Samw 03:53, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

why rewrite when I wrote the original content? I represent the copyright holder. please clarify what must be done to avoid the reposting of the copyvio message. Stuph 18:01, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

I only suggested a rewrite to avoid waiting for an admin to validate that you're the copyright holder. Samw 00:54, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

well, i won't be rewriting it. what else do i need to do? I've sent two emails. its silly to block this article. Stuph 12:24, 20 April 2006 (UTC)