Talk:Ornithology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Birds Ornithology is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. Please do not substitute this template.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

Biology WikiPortal

I don't know much about ornithology but I'll try and research it and clean up the article a bit. I think all the links to various organisations can be deleted or at least put in the 'see other' section - that is to say, basically the entire article. Any objections?


None at all it seems, but when did you post?

Someone did a deal of work getting all those links. Better not to delete them, just move them to "See other"

I've had it in mind to try and produce something creditable, but I need to get the proverbial round tuit! When you've done your bit I'll have a look to see what I can add John H, Morgan 10:32, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

If you become an ornithologist then you can see boobies and tits. JIP | Talk 08:17, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Lol nice pun JIP Sk33by 21:04, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

I am an expert - the page is actually a very good start but you've listed some groups that are bird conservation organizations, not ornithological organizations. Related, but not the same. I don't quite know how this works but I will check back here to see if you would like some help and if so, will make arrangements to work with you privately. I want to remain anonymous.

You have not been anonymous in your last post. In fact I wouldnt be surprised if your first name was Ellen ;) anyway, welcome aboard and please feel free to add to the article. You need to log out if you really want to be more anonymous. Shyamal 07:37, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

I am expert. I specialise in Geese and Ducks and would like to help improve your Ornithology article, particulary with respects to Geese and Ducks. George 22:03, 30 Sept 2006

[edit] The "links" issue

This certainly needs sorting out. It seems quite odd that there are some links to organisations and not to others. Would something like a dmoz link at the bottom to ornithology sites help to tidy up the article a little. Equally the publications section seems to be advertising for some publications? --Herby talk to me 14:37, 9 October 2006 (UTC)