Opinion polling in the Canadian federal election, 2006/Old projections
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Seat predictions
The Hill and Knowlton election predictor has been used to compile these figures. A party needs 155 seats or more to have a majority. Bold text indicates a majority while italic text indicates a plurality. A star denotes the Official Opposition in the listed scenario.
The Hill and Knowlton predictor uses a "national swing" predictor to create riding predictors. A change in the national polling as it relates to the final vote percentages from the 2004 elections result in a change in each riding by that amount. The downside to this method is that it assumes the entire country and each riding to be fluctuating at the same rate and does not take local issues into account. However, it is helpful in indicating certain indirect trends.
The seats positioned in the "other" column are usually Surrey North and two ridings in Saskatchewan. The Hill and Knowlton predictor does not take into account different independent candidates running in those ridings, nor does it take into account the death of independent MP Chuck Cadman who won Surrey North in 2004 but will obviously not be a candidate in 2006.
Polling Firm | Date | Link | Liberal | Conservative | NDP | BQ | Other |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Final Results | January 23, 2006 | HTML | 103* | 124 | 29 | 51 | 1 |
Strategic Counsel | January 22, 2006 | 56 | 149 | 41 | 61* | 1 | |
SES Research | January 22 | 84* | 134 | 34 | 55 | 1 | |
Ipsos-Reid | January 21 | 46 | 157 | 42 | 62* | 1 | |
EKOS | January 20 | 53 | 151 | 41 | 62* | 1 | |
Strategic Counsel | January 19 | 63* | 154 | 28 | 62 | 1 | |
SES Research | January 19 | 88* | 135 | 28 | 56 | 1 | |
EKOS | January 19 | 73* | 135 | 40 | 59 | 1 | |
Strategic Counsel | January 17 | 38 | 173 | 31 | 65* | 1 | |
SES Research | January 17 | 93* | 130 | 34 | 51 | 0 | |
EKOS | January 17 | 56 | 149 | 41 | 61* | 1 | |
SES Research | January 16 | 84* | 135 | 31 | 65 | 1 | |
Strategic Counsel | January 16 | 33 | 178 | 31 | 65* | 1 | |
EKOS | January 16 | 73* | 131 | 42 | 61 | 1 | |
Ipsos-Reid | January 15 | 49 | 157 | 42 | 59* | 1 | |
SES Research | January 15 | 67* | 149 | 33 | 58 | 1 | |
EKOS | January 15 | 50 | 156 | 40 | 61* | 1 | |
SES Research | January 14 | 80* | 146 | 28 | 53 | 1 | |
Strategic Counsel | January 14 | 54 | 166 | 26 | 61* | 1 | |
SES Research | January 13 | 70* | 155 | 24 | 58 | 1 | |
Strategic Counsel | January 12 | 58 | 162 | 26 | 61* | 1 | |
Ipsos-Reid | January 12 | 73* | 139 | 36 | 59 | 1 | |
SES Research | January 12 | 86* | 153 | 17 | 51 | 1 | |
EKOS | January 12 | 58 | 148 | 40 | 61* | 1 | |
EKOS | January 12 | 53 | 153 | 39 | 62* | 1 | |
Strategic Counsel | January 11 | 52 | 165 | 26 | 64* | 1 | |
SES Research | January 11 | 67* | 154 | 25 | 61 | 1 | |
EKOS | January 11 | 67[1] | 137 | 37 | 67[1] | 0 | |
Strategic Counsel | January 10 | 57 | 162 | 26 | 62* | 1 | |
SES Research | January 10 | 69* | 154 | 23 | 61 | 1 | |
EKOS | January 10 | 75* | 137 | 34 | 61 | 1 | |
Strategic Counsel | 9 January | 61 | 157 | 27 | 62* | 1 | |
SES Research | 9 January | 84* | 129 | 31 | 63 | 1 | |
EKOS | 9 January | 49 | 165 | 27 | 66* | 1 | |
Decima Research | 8 January | 56 | 142 | 48 | 61* | 1 | |
Strategic Counsel | 8 January | 72* | 147 | 21 | 67 | 1 | |
SES Research | 8 January | 97* | 127 | 29 | 54 | 1 | |
SES Research | 7 January | 100* | 127 | 29 | 51 | 1 | |
EKOS | 4 January | 86* | 133 | 35 | 53 | 1 | |
SES Research | 3 January | 95* | 131 | 19 | 62 | 1 | |
Strategic Counsel | December 31, 2005 | 103* | 110 | 31 | 63 | 1 | |
Ipsos-Reid | December 31 | 91* | 121 | 36 | 59 | 1 | |
Decima Research | December 30 | 95* | 106 | 41 | 65 | 1 | |
SES Research | December 29 | 114* | 121 | 13 | 59 | 1 | |
Strategic Counsel | December 18 | 110 | 94* | 43 | 60 | 1 | |
Strategic Counsel | December 13 | 114 | 97* | 34 | 62 | 1 | |
Pollara | December 11 | 146 | 95* | 14 | 52 | 1 | |
Ipsos-Reid | December 11 | 132 | 80* | 33 | 62 | 1 | |
SES Research | December 11 | 145 | 97* | 11 | 54 | 1 | |
Strategic Counsel | December 10 | 123 | 101* | 19 | 62 | 3 | |
SES Research | December 10 | 154 | 89* | 14 | 50 | 1 | |
SES Research | 9 December | 154 | 89* | 14 | 50 | 1 | |
SES Research | 8 December | 166 | 63* | 30 | 48 | 1 | |
Strategic Counsel | 8 December | 131 | 87* | 27 | 62 | 1 | |
Ipsos-Reid | 8 December | 119 | 105* | 20 | 62 | 2 | |
Last election | 28 June 2004 | 135 | 99* | 19 | 54 | 1 |
- ↑ The Liberals, by convention, would become the official opposition should they tie with another party for the second highest number of seats in the House of Commons, as they were previously the governing party. Any mid-term reduction in the number of Liberal seats, however, would immediately result in the Bloc Quebecois becoming the official opposition.
The Laurier Institute for the Study of Public Opinion and Policy, using Barry Kay's regional swing model, predicted on January 10, 2006 that the election would result in the following representation in the House of Commons: 133 Conservative, 93 Liberal, 60 Bloc Quebecois, and 22 NDP.[1] On January 20, this prediction was updated to call for the following representation: 139 Conservative, 83 Liberal, 56 Bloc Quebecois and 29 NDP. Each day during the campaign, the results of these two models and four others are averaged and displayed in graph form at TrendLines.ca. The volatility of Seat Projections (and polls) as exhibited in the 2004 Election is illustrated there as well.