Online music store

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article contains unencyclopedic lists that may require cleanup.
To meet Wikipedia's quality standards, please help improve this article by: removing items which are not notable, encyclopedic, or helpful from embedded lists; incorporating appropriate items into the main body of the article; and discussing this issue on the talk page.

This article or section is not written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article.
Please improve it or discuss changes on the talk page. See Wikipedia's guide to writing better articles for suggestions.

An online music store is an online service that sells audio, usually music, on a per-song and/or subscription basis. The realization of the market for these services grew widespread around the time of Napster, a music and file sharing service created by Shawn Fanning that made a major impact on the Internet scene during the year 2000. Some services have tethered downloads, meaning that playing songs requires an active membership.

1 Overview
2 Compared to file swapping
- 2.1 Advantages
- 2.2 Disadvantages
3 See Also
4 External links

[edit] Overview

In 2000 Sony became the first company to make music from one of the major labels available for sale on the internet, with 'The Store'. The big record companies were apprehensive to license their catalogs to outside companies and refused the late 90's requests of MP3.com, Cductive and eMusic (then called Goodnoise) to sell digital song downloads. They eventually decided to start their own services, which they could control directly.

Sony's service turned out to be an ill-conceived affair. Not only was the service difficult for consumers to navigate and use, Sony's expensive pricing of US$3.50 per song track turned off many early adopters of the service. Furthermore, as MP3 Newswire pointed out in its review of the service, users were actually only renting the tracks for that $3.50. After a certain point the files expired and could not be played again without repurchase. The service quickly failed.

Undaunted, the record industry tried again. Universal Music Group and Sony teamed up with a service called Duet, later renamed PressPlay. EMI, AOL/Time Warner and BMG teamed up with MusicNet. Again, both services struggled, hampered by high prices and heavy limitations on how downloaded files could be used once paid for. In the end, consumers chose instead to flock to the free file sharing programs, which were far more convenient to use and also free to use.

Non-major label services like eMusic, Cductive and Listen.com (now Rhapsody.com) sold the music of independent labels and artists to keep in the game, however digital music downloads began to gain popularity after the launch of the iTunes Music Store and the creation of portable music and mp3 players. This enabled music fans to take their music with them, wherever they went.

Newer services have started in recent years, that continue to sell the music of independent artists. Magnatune, Amie Street, and Mindawn are sites that specifically cater to the independent music community at large. Another trend in music download sites include Fonogenic which combine the idea behind an MP3 blog which is editorial in nature, and online music stores which provide instant access to buy and download songs.

[edit] Compared to file swapping

Much controversy surrounds this issue, so many or perhaps all of these points are disputed.

[edit] Advantages

More respectful to copyright law as interpreted by groups like the RIAA.
- Decreases chances of legal disadvantages.
- Avoids some social stigmas and moral regrets that some people have.
More consistent and higher quality meta-data, because the entering of the meta-data is more centralized and done by groups with financial interests.
Companies sometimes feel more accountable to users than other users.
Centralized repository of music makes it easier to find the songs you want.
- Notably Apple Computer CEO Steve Jobs claimed in his introduction of the iTunes Music Store that file swappers get paid less than minimum wage for the work required to download audio.

[edit] Disadvantages

Some stores cannot be accessed on a Linux computer.
Most stores only offer music in one audio format with Digital Rights Management.
Users do not have a "hard copy" of purchased music, such as a CD, for archiving.
Some stores do not provide artwork or liner notes.
Stores have limited catalogs, because of more attention paid to copyright concerns.
- Some file swapping advocates claim that, because file sharing costs nothing, any pay service essentially costs infinitely many times more than file swapping.
Many stores use Digital Rights Management, which limits use of music on certain devices. The restrictions vary between different services, and sometimes even between different songs from the same service.
Music stores for independent artists do not support record labels. Criticisms of major record labels include overpricing, oligopolies, and lack of support for artists. Mainstream music stores do pay royalties to RIAA.