Talk:Onion dome

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good articles Onion dome has been listed as a good article under the good-article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do.
If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a review.
Did You Know An entry from Onion dome appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 9 September 2006.
Wikipedia
Image of list with checkmark and clipboard
 This article has been nominated for Selected article, at the Architecture portal.
This article covers subjects of relevance to Architecture. To participate, visit the Wikipedia:WikiProject Architecture for more information. The current monthly improvement drive is Architectural history.
Portal:Architecture
 Architecture Portal
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the assessment scale.

The idea that the shape of the traditional Russian church domes is based on the shape of onions is ridiculous. Were ancient Slavs worshipping some onion deity? No traces of such a vegetable cult exist. However, there IS a striking similarity between the shape of the onion domes (together with the towers that hold them) with the shape of the young hallucinogenic liberty caps (psylocibe semilanceata) mushrooms. The same shape of domes and arches can be seen in many instances of islamic architecture in Iran, Pakistan, India and the whole of Central Asia - everywhere the Indo-Aryans went. I personally have no doubts that the onion (persian) domes are the last traces of the Soma(Haoma) worship. Gene K

By the way, what is an onion dome called in Russian? Wile E. Heresiarch 03:40, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

They are called "makovki", i.e. poppy heads. Gene K
My sources say луковица, or "lúkovitsa" (onion) Adam Cuerden talk 05:12, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Update: Since the article has been rewritten, I've withdrawn the vfd request. Here is the vfd discussion: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Onion Dome Many thanks to TenOfAllTrades . Wile E. Heresiarch 03:37, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Proposed new article

New article text on onion domes in architecture moved to article space. Old article text below refers to satirical website.

[edit] Old article text

Satirical site poking fun at Orthodox Christianity, has caused heated debate within the Orthodox community. Many Orthodox Christians declare the site to be heretical and blasphemous, while others hale it as a breath of fresh air. Onion Dome is an American site, reaching the nearly six million Eastern Orthodox Christians in the Uited States.

[edit] External links

Missing: (Sketch for Addition:) You will also find Onion Domes in South Germany, in Austria and in the Italian South Tirol, where Catholic Religion is dominant. They are there the typical attribute of barbeque churches. The Munich Frauenkirche has an Onion Dome, too. --Hella 08:32, 7 August 2005 (UTC) who has now not enough time (and probably not architectural clue) to add to this article

These are not onion domes, but pear domes and butt domes. They are not like onions at all. --Ghirlandajo 07:38, 8 August 2005 (UTC)


Is there any symbolism to the shape of the onion domes themselves? I have heard that it was supposed to represent the tongues of flame that appeared over the heads of the apostles in Acts 2. 129.8.249.10 16:50, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

I was recently in Russia and the tourguide claimed that onion domes were symbolizing candles. Is there any definative answer to that stated by the Church itself? 67.182.22.63 14:01, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Proto-Gothic

It seems logical that elongated, or onion, domes were part of the same proto-Gothic trend aimed at achieving pyramidal, vertical emphasis

Should that be pseudo-Gothic, meaning resembling the Gothic, rather than proto-Gothic, which implies that it was ancestor of the Gothic? —Michael Z. 2006-09-09 00:37 Z

[edit] GA Comments

Nice article. I edited some minor things, i.e. boldface at the lead section and external links. However, there are other things, before this article passes GA quality:

  1. About verifiability. I know most references are in Russian, but to make this article verifiable, could editors translate the reference in English and put note like (in Russian) ?
  2. Are there any English reference about onion dome? Because English source is preferable and more verifiable in the English version of Wikipedia.
  3. I found Image:Vytegra.jpg has an obsolete license tag. Could you please change that?

— Indon (reply) — 20:12, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] GA passed

I saw the image tag has been fixed, but I'm still annoyed by cyrillic citations. Per WP:WIAGA, here's my assessement of this article:

1. It is well written.

(a) compelling prose to non-specialist readers: passes
  • I enjoy reading this small and compact article.
(b) logical structure and lead section: needs a little bit improvement
  • Lead section can be expanded a little bit to summarize the 2 historical views and the symbolism.
(c) follows WP:MOS: passes
(d) technical jargons: passes

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

(a) references: needs English references
(b) inline citations: passes
(c) reliable sources: no comment
  • The problem is that citations are given in Cyrillics. Thus I cannot read it to assess how reliable sources are.
(d) no original research: passes

3. It is broad in its coverage.

(a) all aspects: passes
  • As far as I read, major topics about onion dome, i.e. its history and its symbol, have been given.
(b) stays focus: passes

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

(a) no bias: passes
(b) all viewpoints: passes

5. It is stable, no edit wars: passes

  • In fact, it is too stable as no answers have been given to my comments in the previous thread.

6. It contains images.

(a) properly tagged and have captions: passes
  • Image tag problem has been fixed.
(b) lack of images: passes
  • All images are informative to the subject.

I still think that sources in the References should be translated to English, rather than Cyrllic like that, making reader unknown about sources of this article. I assume good faith of the reliable sources given in this article. Despite of this citation problem, the article passes GA standards. — Indon (reply) — 09:53, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Comments

I'd like to make a comment here if I may. I like this article and feel it certainly has the makings of an FA; however, as someone interested in architecture I like to know "what's going on under the hood" so to speak - to be really "broad in it's coverage" I think some mention of it's construction is necessary, sections ideally, material, structural principle etc. - does anyone know where this sort of citable information might be living - I'll go and have a look but perhaps some others can too.--Mcginnly | Natter 21:43, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Some mention of the Royal Pavilion would be good too I think. --Mcginnly | Natter 21:47, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

A helmet dome stub need creating. --Mcginnly | Natter 22:09, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Not just Russian?

I'm confused. In this article all the pictures and information seems to all be about Russian architecture. Aren't Onion Domes used all around the world? Byzantium? Indian Moghal - Taj Mahal, etc? I don't really know all that much about Architecture or anything, but yeah I'm confused. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dustin Pearson (talk • contribs) 19:26, 10 December 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Not just Russian?

I'm confused. In this article all the pictures and information seems to all be about Russian architecture. Aren't Onion Domes used all around the world? Byzantium? Indian Moghal - Taj Mahal, etc? I don't really know all that much about Architecture or anything, but yeah I'm confused.

Dustin ॐ 19:26, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../o/n/i/Talk%7EOnion_dome_dfca.html"