Talk:One Piece anime (English adaptation)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

α{| class="messagebox standard-talk" style="text-align:center;" |- | width="48px" | || This article was nominated for deletion on 27/7/2006. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |}

[edit] Work in progress

Bare with me for a few days, this is work in progress. I apologise for the poor page standards and will work to get this up to Wikipedia's stands ASAP. Angel Emfrbl 08:12, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] NPOV Edit

This article was way too POV; I'll spare you the details (compare edit versions if you want to see specifics), but suffice to say that "for no apparent reason", "supposed", and links to websites called "Moogle Cavern" and "Anime Cauldron" do not belong on Wikipedia. I realize bold edits like this one cause debates, so if you have a problem with my edit (beyond an honest mistake on my part, of course), please bring it up here instead of reverting the entire page. -67.163.21.39 06:30, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

That was me. -Unknownwarrior33 06:30, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

I've written them down as commentary instead, which is what they were orginally written down as when the info on this page was on the main One Piece page. Don't know if that helps. The bit from Moogle Cavern is gone now. I reread that one and agreed with you. The Anime Cauldron one brings up a few points that we can't write here and voices a fan opinion of the series. For reference sake its needed, as its one opinion of the series. The one about the differences between the verisons, again needed for the 'edits' bit to support or show what has been edited. The interview with Mr Kahn is arguable whether it is needed or not I'll agree that. [[User:Angel Emfrbl|

What's Wikipedia's policy on dealing with a large chunk of POV info? It has info but it's POV, so is it a delete or change? We COULD try to add in some praise as well. But findign praise for it is VERY hard.

So take my other suggestion... Remove 'critism' or rename it.  ;) Angel Emfrbl 13:03, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

I tried to expand on the critism a little without going too deep and loosing it neutrality, I kept it as basic as I could and didn't nit-pick on what the details of any critism from fans are. It is difficult to handle and I'm tempting now just to say 'forget it we should leave that bit out'. There is also the possiblitiy of renaming it from 'Critism' to 'Fan reaction' which would allow us to write a bit more, but then the section gets away from a neutral stance so again I'm not sure on that. I also seperated the misc information from the critism bit. Angel Emfrbl 10:13, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Over?

http://forums.toonzone.net/showthread.php?t=179749

Is 4Kids dub over? Darien Shields 01:54, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Yes. As the person who was sent that e-mail, I can confirm that this is true. Yashouzoid

Christmas must be early.Anyway to the critisism,or more importanly to the left "apendeges riped off"-Shanks losing an arm is SO vital in the series (on a lesse scale as Zeff,they probably couldnt figure out any other reason why he would stop being a pirate) that they just Couldnt edit it out without geting Oda seriously mad.New Babylon