Talk:On the Justice of Roosting Chickens

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page was voted on for deletion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/On the Justice of Roosting Chickens. The consensus was to keep it. dbenbenn | talk 23:16, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)


violation of NPOV

Contents

[edit] POV

This is a rather rambling essay, not encyclopedic material.Zantastik 05:38, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] A new start

Now it's totally new. -- Toytoy 08:17, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)

  • Since there was a copyvio notice, you should have created the new version in the /Temp subpage. I have re-added the VfD notice since there is still a vote going on, although I imagine that the votes against the old version will not be applied to the newer one (but again, this could have been avoided by using /Temp). -- Curps 19:54, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)

OK, thanks for your noticing. -- Toytoy 04:36, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] The scopes

If you agree, I plan to limit the "Consequences" section as brief as possible. The attacks against him is not only based on this book, they are based on Ward Churchil's political and moral ideas. Therefore, we may put details of his book on this page, and people's attacks of his ideas on his biography page. We may avoid unneed content overlapping.

By the way, I don't have the book. If any of you have a copy of that book, please write about other important topics. Thanks! -- Toytoy 06:21, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] "Scholar"

I wouldn't call Churchill a scholar but rather a polemicist. Эйрон Кинни (t) 01:57, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

This is a polemic, but he has done scholarly work, of varying quality. --Tothebarricades 21:20, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Consequences

Shouldn't the statement "In an extraordinary step, ..." be attributed? Who decides that this is an extraordinary step?