Talk:Omarosa Manigault-Stallworth
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Battle of Network Reality Stars
The current wording is in future or present tense (that Omarosa will be on the show in August 2005). The show has been over for almost a month. I changed the wording once and someone reverted, along with a brief summary of what she talked about on the reunion. I'm going to change it again, and if someone wants to revert, please explain why in the talk section. --JamesB3 04:14, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Unclear
This is definately not clear. Did she or did she not pose nude?
After being fired from the show, her celebrity profile grew. She has been on The Oprah Winfrey Show, made a brief appearance on NBC soap Passions, and a renowned pornographic magazine offered her money to pose nude. At the time of the offer, Omarosa rejected it, declaring that some of her parts were reserved for her then-husband. Due to her marital status being separated (as of October 15, 2005), Omarosa may have different excuses and/or views with regards to nude modeling.
-
- Anyone got a link to the nudies?
- (What? I'll take a gander)
I don't think she posed nude whatsoever. — Mark Kim (Reply/Start Talk) 00:39, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Biased, to the point of banality
Was this bio written by Ereka Vetrini? It definately reads like it. Im not a fan, im a black woman and she makes us all look bad, but this is too much. The only thing not included in the article is that she's the devils spawn.
- I agree and have added this as an NPOV page. --Ohyeahmormons
[edit] Needs to be redone
I went over the article and this article needs to be re-done to the point where it's more neutral and more organized. I'm not gonna put a fix tag on it, but I feel that this article needs to be rebuffed a bit more to a more positive and a more encyclopedia-quality point. — Mark Kim (Reply/Start Talk) 04:07, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
- Article has been notified to be redone, as it is more of why everyone hates her than an actual bio. — Ohyeahmormons 09:27, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
- I'd say leave the cleanup tag on, but proceed with putting the NPOV tag on it, it's somewhat unbalanced, but for the least I'd say it's more of a cleanup issue at this point. — Mark Kim (Reply/Start Talk) 00:38, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
I agree! This article makes her look a little too negative! It's very biased...it is knocking her more than it is informing readers. It makes Omarosa look very Hateful, and whether you dislike her or not is one's own personal preference, but Wikipedia shouldn't be encouraging people to dislike the woman! ...and as far as the comment that was made about her making black women look bad, I'm a black woman and I disagree with that! I don't look at Omarosa's behavior as being a black or white issue! The woman is acting, and that's it! LOL! I think people should stop taking her so seriously and let it go! I love Omarosa...she's intelligent and articulate; and being a 20 year old black woman who is in college, I have much admiration for her! Therefore, I disagree, I don't feel she makes black women look bad! There are so many other's who do a much better job at making black women look bad than Omarosa ever could! I'm not saying you guys have to love her, but give her a break and stop all of the bashing!!! **Alicia**
- This article is now a Condition 5, repeat, I'm gonna move Omarosa Manigault to Condition 5. — Mark Kim (Reply/Start Talk) 03:37, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- I extensively cleaned up the article. You can thank me later. Deltabeignet 04:29, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] ATTENTION: Omarosa's Nigerian Heritage
I really commend Ihunnaya for spotting this out, but citations are still lacking (whether electronic or print). If anyone can actually cite any of Omarosa's Nigerian Roots, then you should feel free to cite anything out. Anything. Period. — Mark Kim (Reply/Start Talk) 18:28, 17 June 2006 (UTC)