User talk:Oli Filth
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hi, please feel free to add stuff to this page, but make sure you sign it properly!
Contents |
[edit] Welcome
Welcome to Wikiproject Electronics. We all hope you will enjoy editing with us. Please refer to the project page for lists of open tasks or feel free to add some new ones.--Light current 00:13, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Raised cosine
- That looks like an excellent contribution to me! I know its quite technical but it probably needs to be so. I will defer opinion on complexity until we've a few more comments. But well done!.--Light current 02:32, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
The raised cosine filter is listed on the linear analog filter template, but it is a linear DIGITAL filter. This should be fixed. PAR 21:29, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
- Would probably make more sense to put feedback on articles on the relevant talk page rather than here, so that everyone can see it. See my response at Talk:Raised-cosine filter. Oli Filth 22:14, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi! I was wondering how you made the plot of the different rolloff values of the filter? I've been using rcosine and then freqz() to plot the frequency response, but of course for the nyquist pulse it is less than ideal. I have to include a plot similiar to this in a report I'm writing for GMSK vs. M-QAM. Cheers!
- At the time, I didn't have the Signal Processing toolbox, so I didn't have rcosine() or freqz(), so I plotted the graphs "manually", by using the equations as in the article. By Nyquist pulse, do you mean the plot for β = 1? I think I faked that one. Oli Filth 20:54, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hi / TVI
- Hi, Interesting to hear that you have an interest in comms, would you be interested in joining in with some pages on radio equipment and Television interference ?Cadmium 17:21, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
- Hi, I just read the message you left to me. Thanks. I just realized that not everybody is entitled to edit the articles. If everybody does it, the the articles will become very messy. Those awful behaviors were really not my intention. Thank you for your message! I just moved my comments about Wiener process to its talk page. I hope that somebody can respond to my comments. I am not an experienced user, do you think that is ok? I hope that this time I am right. Jackzhp(talk) 2006.08.28
-
- See my reply at User talk:Jackzhp. Oli Filth 09:13, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] License tagging for Image:OFDM receiver ideal.png
Thanks for uploading Image:OFDM receiver ideal.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:05, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Invitation to WikiProject_Telecommunications
Hi! You have made many good contributions in the area of telecommunications. Why not join the WikiProject Telecommunications? Mange01 00:28, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Regarding your removal about Full Service Broadband
Hi! The Full Service Broadband text under broadband article is just a short summary. My intention is to describe an "overview" what Full Service Broadband is with e.g. technical graphs etc. but cannot do it for the moment since I’m not 100% finished.
Yes it might sound like a marketing spiel, but that’s not the intention. When describing the benefits of Triple Play, VoD, IMS, etc. is that marketing spiel!
- Apologies if it really wasn't a spamming attempt, but vapid buzzword phrases such as "triple play paradigm", "adding mobility and extending connectivity" and "Network-to-Network Interfaces ensure interoperability with partners such as other operators and enterprises" read exactly like marketing speak, and are completely non-descriptive and uninformative.
- If you are writing an article, please make it more informative and to-the-point than this!
Secondly where do you think Full Service Broadband should fit in? Br, Behzad —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Behzad.farmand (talk • contribs) 14:07, 9 December 2006 (UTC).
- As to where to put this information, it clearly does not belong as the second paragraph in the Broadband or Broadband networks articles. Once you have findished the main article, links from various broadband-related articles may be appropriate. Oli Filth 17:31, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
