Talk:Novelty (locomotive)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Novelty (locomotive) has been listed as a good article under the good-article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a review.

	Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
	See also: WikiProject Trains to do list
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments)
Mid	This article has been rated as mid-importance within the Trains WikiProject.
	This article is maintained by the Locomotives task force.

To-do list	Pending tasks for Novelty (locomotive):	(purge cache –  edit this list)
	Rewrite the lead section to give a complete overview and summary of the article Complete the specifications in the infobox Research and add a few more references and add inline citations as appropriate
See also Wikipedia:WikiProject Trains/Todo

"Only the wheels under the firebox (those to the left on the illustration here) were driven, the other wheels were not connected to the drive in any way." However, there are two drawings which are facing opposite directions. I guess this refers to the first one? This should be made clear. SpaceCaptain 15:32, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] "No other" claim

I don't quite follow the "no other locos built this way" claim. As described it appears to be very similar to the "Tom Thumb (locomotive)" and some other early Baltimore and Ohio Railroad locomotives. For now, I've qualified the statement to reflect a British context. Mangoe 16:51, 27 September 2006 (UTC)