User talk:Nlitement
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Nlitement, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! BE GOOD! jacoplane 19:15, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Your POV
Dear Nlitement, Unfortunately your point of view is not correct. I won't say it is hypocrisy though, it might be rude... I am not, but you are, comparing these two incidents... What I am saying is in these two cases Europian has different standards. I cannot see what is hard for you to see in this? By the way I am not supporting what has happened in some muslim countries. That is wrong too. I do not have double standars... Resid Gulerdem 00:28, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] AfD for Firearms (computer game)
Please consider removing your AfD request for the firearms computer game. It's a highly notable mod: It won PC Gamer's mod of the year, was released on CD from valve, and at one point in time was the #3 most played halflife mod (before DoD came out, and that pushed it back to #4). It's been around for years. I notice from your user page you state you are only 13 years old. Firearms would have been largely before your time. Please see forums.worldatwarmod.com and check the Firearms section for evidence of notability. Thanks. ⇒ SWATJester Ready Aim Fire! 04:52, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/True Combat: Elite
As per your comments here, it's obvious you flooded AfD with several mod articles as retaliation for your article being nominated. This is unnacceptable behavior, and if you continue to show such aggression, you may be blocked in the future. --InShaneee 22:39, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
- Call it what you want, the fact is you basically admit to doing it to prove a point in SEVERAL places. Whatever your reasoning for it is, the plain fact is that its against wikipedia policy, no matter how you sugercoat it. --InShaneee 04:32, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hi
I would like to ask one person who voted on True Combat: Elite deleting. Do you even play games? Have you even heard about the mod? Have you checked anything about it? Have you seen my phat and big comment where I mentioned a lot of obvious reasons for notability. You don't have to answer. I know the answer. --nlitement [talk] 00:36, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- Since I voted, further evidence of notability has been added so I have changed to a keep vote. Stifle 09:09, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
On the same subject, the article was kept per the afd, but you might want to establish the notability further on the article itself (by including some references to it on notable sites etc.) so that someone else won't just nominate it again in a few weeks. Thanks. - Bobet 14:42, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Grand Theft Auto 3+ font
Hi, I read over your edit summary on the Grand Theft Auto IV page. I think I know what font you were talking. It is the "Pricedown" TrueType font by Ray Larabie, right? They're the same because Ray Larabie is a former employee of Take-Two Games/Rockstar Games.[1] I have the font and tried to recreate the Grand Theft Auto logo. ;-P --Who What Where Nguyen Why 20:50, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
-
- Thank you for the clarification! :) --nlitement [talk] 20:55, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Edit summary on FPSBANANA
It seems to me that you have acted in an uncivil manner on FPSBANANA. It is important to keep a cool head, despite any comments against you. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and action can be taken against the other parties if necessary. Your involvement in attacking back can only satisfy trolls or anger contributors, and lead to general bad feeling. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks!
TomPhil 11:38, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Please do not make personal attacks on other editors
Please do not make personal attacks on other people, as you did at [2]. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. John254 05:11, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] User boxes
{{User PurePwnage}} |
|
- You may enjoy this user box on your use page! Thanks for all your help to the wikipedia! This is a friendly thank you! :) --DragonWR12LB 19:41, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Personal attacks
You have now been blocked indefinitely. You are been warned long enough so I don't think edit summaries like this are appropriate and you should know it. I will leave a note with User:Jacoplane in case he or someone else wants to help you again. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 19:58, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
- "Vandalism"? Sorry, mister, but I haven't conducted vandalism a single time, and ALL of my edits so far (notify me if any of them are not contributive or factually correct) are legit edits. "Fuck off" was because of the overwhelming amount of obvious facts being asked for "citation", and was NOT meant for ANY specific user. Is Wikipedia this full of bull (and I'm using a euphenism because I'm sure you'll refer to "assume good faith" as soon as you see me using my own rhetoric) I'm bothered by bull, so I'm just here, nicely removing and being bold about editors screwing up badly. Ironically, I could write some edit summary to this edit like "fuck, things sure are fucked up pretty fuckily around fucky here" regarding the dumb in the fact that I had not attacked ANYONE SPECIFICALLY! Give me one evidence where I had mentioned a person, or a revision? Oops, there's none. This is the bull I'm talking about. Please, there are better things to worry than to ban some people because of some "behind the scene" metadata with a little cuss and a preposite.. Hint: the "fuck off" was towards the MANNERS and the piece of "[citation needed] " template, not ANY person or any group of editors. Tell me why all my effort in writing good articles, using proper punctuation and spelling, and using a Wikipedia-like style is overseen by admins who only look at some "edit summaries" who nobody really cares about? --nlitement [talk] 21:00, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- This is for your continued personal attacks, for which you have been warned sufficiently enough. If you still want to argue and can convince someone else to unblock you for a second time, use the {{unblock}} template and make the argument. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 04:06, 3 October 2006 (UTC)