User talk:Niro5
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This user is a member of the Biography Wikiproject. |
Contents |
[edit] Welcome
Hello, Niro5, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 04:03, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Syracuse
I agree with you completely, but just get ready for a barrage of attacks. AdamBiswanger1 18:51, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
- "Countless objective arguments"? At least you should doubt that Google is an "objective" argument to stress importance of an entry: my idea is that we are writing a cultural encyclopedia, not an Internet service... Maybe you could disagree, but at least try to have a broader point of view on the thing. See you soon!--Attilios 20:57, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
- What you say is of course reasonable, but I must disagree. now I'll enter in philosophy: you will never convince me that the knowledge of Syracuse, NY, Jeopardy! or Michael Jackson will make people better that a visit to Syracuse, Italy. This is the way in which I see culture: something that can make people better and improve their felicity. Personally, I think that if a proportion should be here, the sole Main sights section of Syracuse, Italy should be longer than the whole Syracuse, New York. But this of course is my opinion. It's also the same opinion of the Britannica editors, and Britannica's is a respectable point of view for me in building an encyclopedia. But it seems that our opinion of what must be this encyclopedia diverge a bit. What helps me is that currently opposers are a minority in the poll... Bye!! --Attilios 21:53, 6 July 2006 (UTC) (P.S.: Syracuse was probably more "important" than Thebes...)
- The former is partly serious, partly a joke. Frankly speaking, if you had a relative asking you an advice for a trip, you'd really advice him Syracuse, NY? I'm totally not convinced by your arguments. I disagree with the "intelligenzia" definition and the idea of the Google "mass" having to be respected. I'm sure you're here 'case: 1) you have fun writing an encyclopedia; 2) you want to do the best work you can. What's the role of the "mass" in all this? I repeat it, the Internet mass uses it mainly for pornography. I like Wikipedia for it has no bias, and also some info on pornography is welcome, but let's remain serious, please. now, to speak frankly, your replies are starting to look sophistic: first we agree to have a poll, and then when the poll is against you you say that "democracy has killed Socrates and elected Hitler". Sorry, but this is the typical argument of the ones who, when they see themselves losing, go against the rules (Silvio Berlusconi is Nr. 1 in this). I wrote a lot of times that Googles is probably not the most correct judge to validate an entry's "importance", but you and other "syracusans" never tried to argument this. I said that Michael Jackson has more Googles entries than Syracuse or even Taj Mahal, and... someone replied that the comparison must be done instead with less important Michael Jacksons: I wrote that to point out the unrelevance of Googles, and my argument was skillfully diverted to favour your opinion. This looks at me as the work a lawyer defending a guilt man (John Grisham is famous also here in Italy, eh eh!). All this, written in the utmost respect for your ideas, of course. But also convinced that they are wrong, eh eh. Again frankly speaking, all this discussion has no importance for me: it's simply interesting to see how "campanilistic" (do you have this word in English?) can be intelligent people in things they are fond of. Ciao! --Attilios 22:28, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
- Ah ah! If you are not already a lawyer, you should soon start to study to become one of them. I try to be objective, and declaring that a 300,000/1,000,000 US city is not notable would be not intelligent. But this does not mean that it is equally notable that Syracuse, Italy (at least in my view). Ciao!--Attilios 22:36, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
- Again you made me laugh. No, I'll never cease from the idea that S,IT must be placed in Syracuse. If one day one Michael Jackson should made the record of home runs in the Idaho league, growing to "notable" status too, this will mean that Michael Jackson the singer should be moved to Michael Jackson (singer) or maybe Michael Jackson (pedophile)? But this will not forbid they both both will be present in Michael Jackson (disambiguation)... I seem we never talk to abolish Syracuse (disambiguation), didn't we? Ciao and greetings to Aunt Millie. --Attilios 23:07, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
- Ah ah! If you are not already a lawyer, you should soon start to study to become one of them. I try to be objective, and declaring that a 300,000/1,000,000 US city is not notable would be not intelligent. But this does not mean that it is equally notable that Syracuse, Italy (at least in my view). Ciao!--Attilios 22:36, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
- The former is partly serious, partly a joke. Frankly speaking, if you had a relative asking you an advice for a trip, you'd really advice him Syracuse, NY? I'm totally not convinced by your arguments. I disagree with the "intelligenzia" definition and the idea of the Google "mass" having to be respected. I'm sure you're here 'case: 1) you have fun writing an encyclopedia; 2) you want to do the best work you can. What's the role of the "mass" in all this? I repeat it, the Internet mass uses it mainly for pornography. I like Wikipedia for it has no bias, and also some info on pornography is welcome, but let's remain serious, please. now, to speak frankly, your replies are starting to look sophistic: first we agree to have a poll, and then when the poll is against you you say that "democracy has killed Socrates and elected Hitler". Sorry, but this is the typical argument of the ones who, when they see themselves losing, go against the rules (Silvio Berlusconi is Nr. 1 in this). I wrote a lot of times that Googles is probably not the most correct judge to validate an entry's "importance", but you and other "syracusans" never tried to argument this. I said that Michael Jackson has more Googles entries than Syracuse or even Taj Mahal, and... someone replied that the comparison must be done instead with less important Michael Jacksons: I wrote that to point out the unrelevance of Googles, and my argument was skillfully diverted to favour your opinion. This looks at me as the work a lawyer defending a guilt man (John Grisham is famous also here in Italy, eh eh!). All this, written in the utmost respect for your ideas, of course. But also convinced that they are wrong, eh eh. Again frankly speaking, all this discussion has no importance for me: it's simply interesting to see how "campanilistic" (do you have this word in English?) can be intelligent people in things they are fond of. Ciao! --Attilios 22:28, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
- What you say is of course reasonable, but I must disagree. now I'll enter in philosophy: you will never convince me that the knowledge of Syracuse, NY, Jeopardy! or Michael Jackson will make people better that a visit to Syracuse, Italy. This is the way in which I see culture: something that can make people better and improve their felicity. Personally, I think that if a proportion should be here, the sole Main sights section of Syracuse, Italy should be longer than the whole Syracuse, New York. But this of course is my opinion. It's also the same opinion of the Britannica editors, and Britannica's is a respectable point of view for me in building an encyclopedia. But it seems that our opinion of what must be this encyclopedia diverge a bit. What helps me is that currently opposers are a minority in the poll... Bye!! --Attilios 21:53, 6 July 2006 (UTC) (P.S.: Syracuse was probably more "important" than Thebes...)
[edit] Hurry, before they notice
"Siracusa", as it is spelled, is actually the #1 search result for the italian google. You could get torn apart on that one if they see it. AdamBiswanger1 19:53, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] small world indeed
There is a lot of Washington DC stuff needed for articles that I have in mind or have already worked on so just keep working away at those Circles and what ever else catches your eye. I have a lot of D.C. content and photographs already on wikipedia, but there is a lot there and it is a long way from Dixon NM. Carptrash 14:39, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Boot Village
No worries... to be truthful, I barely remembered that article. I think I just stub sorted it into.. Cambria locations... V. Joe 17:06, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Not sure how to get in touch with you
Each time I put something up about any of the cooperative businesses in town it gets taken down. I imagine it is because it seems to be an ad, yet P&C and Brugers stay up all over the Syracuse site. The Syracuse Real Food Co-op and the Cooperative Credit union are owned by the community and have been for years. Why do these keep coming down? kris.venne@gmail.com —The preceding unsigned comment was added by KVenneSyr (talk • contribs).
- I'll respond to this on this user's talk page. -newkai t-c 17:22, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- Check User talk:KVenneSyr about KvenneSyr's co-op ambitions. I really don't know how we should proceed in regards to businesses in articles. -newkai t-c 23:00, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Senator Theartre.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Senator Theartre.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:08, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Trip to the Met
How did your trip to the Met go? Did you get some good shots of PD art?--ragesoss 02:24, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 02:42, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Haha
Got it now. Good joke, I agree, a little nip would have made for a more satisfactory rebellion ;)Wikipediarules2221 03:27, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
