User talk:NickCatal
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Howard Dean in Potential Democratic candidates
To my understanding, the category "Other people mentioned as potential candidates" does not exclude candidates who have personally said they will not run: See Obama on the same page, and Rice for the Republicans. I put a note on the talk page to seek consensus to add him back, because I believe he fits that section of the article's criteria well. Get back to me on that talk page or on my talk page. Thanks! -Umdunno 03:53, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
We're still confused as to why he is ineligible. Wikipedia and Google searches returned nothing for me on the legal reason he is not. Can you give me a link? -Umdunno 18:03, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
No legal reason. DNC rules/policies. You can't have a chairman running for president. Plus, who is saying he may run? I can create a store selling "NickCatal For President" products and "Draft NickCatal" --Nick Catalano contrib talk 03:45, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
The idea of Howard Dean running is much different than the idea of a "normal" person running - for example, he has run for Democratic nomination in the past. At any rate, he could always resign as DNC chairman to run for president. I agree that it isn't likely, but still possile... --Tim4christ17 11:31, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks for reversing the edit
It wasn't an accident. George W. Bush is an example of a Police State executive. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 206.124.6.4 (talk • contribs) 05:40, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- Please explain yourself on the Article's talk page --Nick Catalano contrib talk 05:48, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
Of course it's controversial. The most powerful government in the world does not want to be called a Police State. You're demonstrating that.
[edit] My talk
Replied. Ian¹³/t 20:02, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] thanx
thanx for fixing my spelling —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DarthJuJu (talk • contribs) date.
[edit] Michelle Leslie
I removed the word "major" from the Michelle Leslie article. I also explained why. If you do not agree please explain without blank revert. You are no doubt aware of the need to assume good faith on wikipedia. Cheers --Merbabu 03:02, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- PS, sorry - i'm confused. it seems you "re-reverted" my edits and did exaplain, although i didn't get it. cheers --Merbabu 03:13, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, clicked the wrong button. Sorry for not making it more specific --Nick Catalano contrib talk 05:06, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
