User talk:Nibuod

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Nibuod, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Brian 10:35, 3 July 2006 (UTC)btball

[edit] Your VandalProof Application

Dear Nibuod,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that you have only been a member of the project a week - and I really need to see some recent change patrol work first. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. - Glen 12:08, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your message. Just to respond to the concerns on my talk page, it wasn't at all a bulk rejection, and it did not have to do with your edit count. As mentioned above, quite simply there's no evidence of any prior vandalism patrolling on your part, and we need to ensure that VP users do understand when you use the appropriate {{test}} template as the software does not choose for you. Hope this makes sense, and I look forward approving your app very soon. - Glen 11:39, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism work

Several times you have beaten me to revert vandalism. Keep up the hard work. :) So in recognition of this

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Well done for all your work on reverting vandalism. Mike 15:23, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] VandalSniper

Thanks for applying to use VandalSniper! You have been approved. If have not already done so, you may find instructions to install VS on the project page.

As some of the libraries VandalSniper runs on are currently in transition, there have been a few issues reported with setup. At the moment, Linux is the most compatible platform for VS. If you have questions or problems, you may find help on the project page or its talk page. Please also feel free to contact me for help and I will do my best to assist you.

Thanks for becoming a part of one of Wikipedia's best new software tools! -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 18:20, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome to VandalProof! 1.3

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Anaraug! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page and please note this is VP 1.3 not 1.2.2 see this for the approved list. Andeh 16:59, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Diverting Wikibooks Migration Process

-- 66.45.145.191 14:12, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Upcoming template changes

Hi, I've just noticed that you recently left a templated userpage message. I'm just bringing to your attention that the format and context of these templates will be shortly changing. It is recommended that you visit WikiProject user warnings and harmonisation discussion pages to find out how these changes could affect the templates you use. We also would appreciate any insights or thoughts you may have on the subject. Thanks for your understanding. Best regards Khukri (talk . contribs) 14:25, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] thanks, good work

Thanks for catching the second vandalism incident on Personages of the Three Kingdoms. Megalodon99 (Talk) 15:34, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Request for Reconsideration

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ActionScript

Using written language in its pure form reduces the ability to efficiently share complex information with the reader. Professional con artists know this, and break the rules to better suit their needs and increase positive response. The tactic, though practiced by evil men, is not evil.

My alterations used a little sarcasm, humor, and misinformation in an attempt to transmit knowledge to readers in an indirect, yet more convincing fashion than supported by the standard rules of English grammer and strict interpretations of Wikipedia laws.

You appear to be a person of reasonable intelligence. As a C# programmer, you would quickly discover the many serious shortcomings of Flash and ActionScript were you ever to attempt development using these "technologies". If you were to compare your personal experience and knowledge to the message I burried within the article on ActionScript, you would find that, while the letter of the law was broken, the spirit was not.

I trust you will take this information into proper consideration, and I am confident you will ultimately find that my alterations produced vast improvements to the article's utility.

Good day, sir.

Sorry; thanks.

[edit] BCP Reversion Feedback (6o26am)

Compromised MBCP revisions As a master busines continuity planner since 1995 with prior experience dating to 1970, I tried to provide a competent peer review update when my "learn & share" efforts got reverted.

Also see graphic posted via Talk:Systems thinking
geoWIZard-Passports 23:15, 9 December 2006 (UTC)