Talk:New Criticism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Support statement, please

From the introductory paragraph:

At their best, New Critical readings were brilliant, articulately argued, and broad in scope, but sometimes they were idiosyncratic and moralistic.

The article never really returns to this point. Could we have something to back this assertion up?

Anville 16:49, 16 August 2005 (UTC)

True, I think it is an important point and should be explicated.