New Covenant Theology
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
New Covenant Theology refers to a theological view of redemptive history primarily found in Baptist circles and contrasted with Covenant Theology and Dispensationalism.
It is usually assumed that one has only two primary options in understanding the structure of the Bible -- Dispensationalism or Covenant Theology. However, proponents see what has come to be called New Covenant Theology as a middle ground.
Each of these systems seeks to show how the Old and New Testaments relate to one another. Covenant Theology emphasizes the continuity between Israel and the Church and between the various covenants, whereas the other two systems focus more on the discontinuity.
Contents |
[edit] Recent history
Despite its seemingly recent representation in modern theological discussions, New Covenant Theology has roots extending back to post-Reformation theological developments.
Baptist history, especially the Reformed variety, is rooted in the basic tenets of New Covenant Theology. Much of its primary teaching is reflected in the influential First London Baptist Confession of Faith, especially in its 1646 edition (which is held by many New Covenant Theology churches today). However, in the historical whirlwind of this period, Particular Baptists felt a need to show support for their Reformed brethren in the Congregationalist and Presbyterian churches -- and so adopted the Second London Confession in 1689, a virtual restatement of the famous Westminster Confession with slight modifications, especially, of course, in the area of baptism. This move left an indelible mark of covenant theology in the Particular Baptists from that point forward.
Since 1980 there has been a great resurgence of Reformed theology in Baptist circles. As a result, many within this camp have sought to develop a more clarified system of the covenants that relate back to older thought. Leaders of this movement include such theologians as John Reisinger, Jon Zens, Fred Zaspel, Tom Wells, Gary Long, and Geoff Volker.
Proponents maintain that the primary thrust of New Covenant Theology is the recognition of a promise-fulfillment understanding of Scripture. They suggest that whereas “Dispensationalism cannot get Israel and the church together in any sense whatsoever, and Covenant Theology cannot get them apart” (Reisinger, 19), New Covenant Theology finds the realization of all that the Old Covenant typified in the New Testament church (Covenant Theology, in contrast, merely levels the playing field and identifies them for all intents and purposes). The Mosaic economy is viewed as a temporal, conditional covenant that has been forever replaced by the glory of the New Covenant (2 Corinthians 3).
[edit] Theological Background
In simplistic terms New Covenant Theology is a middle-ground between a Reformed and Dispensationalist view of how the Old Testament, and in particular the Mosaic Covenant, apply to the Christian today. On balance, though, the New Covenantal position probably holds a lot more in common with Reformed Covenant Theology than it does with Dispensationalism.
It is the understanding of how the covenants God makes with men in the Bible work together - how they progressively reveal God - that one sees the differences between Covenant Theology, Dispensationalism and New Covenant Theology worked out. For example: Do all the covenants have the same function? Do the covenants build on top of one another, or do they stand opposed to each other? Are they expressions of one single covenant God has had with man, or are they given for different people in different ages? These questions are what New Covenant Theology seeks to answer.
[edit] The distinctiveness of NCT in Evangelical Theology
NCT is an Evangelical position. However within evangelicalism there are divergent views on a number of topics. One of those topics is how the salvation history fits together, and the relationship of the covenants within salvation history.
NCT is distinctive in that its adherents believe that the purpose of the Mosaic Covenant was "never to offer eternal life" (Kansas, paragraph 21). The New Covenant Statement of Faith gives a further explanation of this position:
"Although the Lord had a gracious purpose in giving this covenant, the covenant itself was a legal covenant that demanded perfect obedience. The failure to obey would result in the curse of God." (New Covenant Statement of Faith, Article 9, "The Old Covenant")
This makes NCT distinct from Covenant Theology, which believes that all of the post-fall covenants are actually an expression of the one "Covenant of Grace", and therefore all function in the same way to outline salvation by faith. NCT would deny that the Mosaic Covenant, in and of itself, performs any [Soteriological] function other than convicting the reader of sin as one understands that perfect obedience to the law is impossible.
[edit] Resources
Reisinger, John G., Abraham’s Four Seeds (Frederick, MD: New Covenant Media, 1998).
Stickland, Wayne G. (General editor), Contributors: Greg L. Bahnsen, Walter C. Kaiser, Douglas J. Moo, Willem A. VanGemeren, Five views on Law and Gospel (Michigan, Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1999)
Tom Wells and Fred Zaspel, New Covenant Theology: Description, Definition, Defense (Frederick, MD: New Covenant Media, 2002).
[edit] External links
Articles:
- What is New Covenant Theology
- A Brief Explanation of "New Covenant Theology" Fred G. Zaspel
- "But I Say Unto You" John Reisinger
- John Piper's view
- History of New Covenant Theology Kevin Hartley
Comparative Theology:
- Theological Systems Compared
- "A New Covenant Critique of Dispensationalism" Regan Ewing
- Covenant Theology vs. New Covenant Theology Tony Warren
New Covenant Statements of Faith:
Web Site Ministries:
Churches and Church Associations:
