User talk:NeuronExMachina
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Note: This is the new account of User:FleaPlus
Hello NeuronExMachina and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.
Here are some tips to help you get started:
- To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
- Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
- If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
- Follow the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset
- Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
- Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
- Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!
Good luck!
[edit] Category:Websites
Please don't add websites to Category:Websites if they're already in a subcategory. For example, Google is in Category:Internet search engines which is under Category:Websites already. Thanks, Lupin 01:04, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Whoops! Sorry, didn't catch that. --NeuronExMachina 01:06, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Plutonium
I replied to a lot of folks on the talk page, and also put the toxicity stuff in context (as per your implied suggestion). Pakaran. 00:03, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you!
Dean Dozen is an very interesting article. Neutrality 02:18, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Thanks for putting it together! --NeuronExMachina 08:30, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Saturn V engine out capability
Apollo 6 and Apollo 13 both had second stage engines shutdown during launch. See the Saturn V Talk page, I posted links to NASA launch reports for Apollo 6 & 13. Saturn V Talk Page Rusty 21:32, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Untagged Images
Thanks for uploading Image:CarnegieMellonBooth.jpg, Image:CarnegieMellonDownCut.jpg and Image:CarnegieMellonMobot.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. :-)
Thanks so much, Mailer Diablo 04:11, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
I actually took these photographs myself. What are the pros and cons of the different licensing methods? Thanks! --NeuronExMachina 22:47, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
[edit] MSL speculation source?
Can you source that claim you added on Mars_Science_Laboratory? Not that I'm saying your fabricating, not at all, only that it would be nice to read up on it. Source it on the article please. --BerserkerBen 04:46, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Good idea. I've added the relevant links to the article. --NeuronExMachina 06:03, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Interested in an L.A.-area Wiki meetup?
It appears as though L.A. has never had a Wiki meetup. Would you be interested in attending such an event? If so, checkout User:Eric Shalov/Wikimeetup
- Eric 16:29, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Jimbo Wales to Attend San Diego Meetup on October 18 2005
Hello, Jimbo Wales will be in San Diego to attend OOPSLA and has agreed to come by and visit with the San Diego wikipedians. If you are interested, you will find more info on my talk page. Johntex\talk 00:54, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Body Worlds exhibits
Hi, thanks for writing up the Body Worlds exhibits. I was wondering why you put some of the titles in parentheses? Maybe that should be explained. Cheers, AxelBoldt 19:45, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Neuroscience
Hey, I notice you have worked on neuroscience-related articles in the past. I'm reviving the Wikipedia:WikiProject Neuroscience and thought you might care to join. Cheers. Semiconscious (talk · home) 09:02, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
- Joined! --NeuronExMachina 03:14, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Awesome! Good to have another grad student aboard. Semiconscious (talk · home) 07:26, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Game ad
It seems someone's found the commercial that you were talking about on the Ecco the Dolphin talk page :) --Ethii 08:59, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Mentifex
The content of the article was "Just a bloody start point. Feel free to inser the real text here ..."[sic] added by an IP in January 2005, and then somebody added a {{delete}} tag. That's it. --Sam Blanning(talk) 13:31, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Hm... I noticed that only the 2005 version was in the deletion log, but (as can be seen in the Artificial Intelligence discussion) I edited a (presumably) more extensive version back in 2004. Is there any way to access this version? --NeuronExMachina 18:23, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, there was a database crash in June 2004, and pages deleted before then can't be restored by sysops. According to WP:DRV "If there is great desire for them it may be possible to retrieve them from the old database files". I suspect that means that only developers can retrieve them, who are the rarest of creatures on Wikimedia, and "great desire" is going to mean a lot. Still, I can't judge how worthwhile the content was, so you're welcome to contact one of them. --Sam Blanning(talk) 19:52, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Hm... although my memory is rusty, I'm guessing that there probably wasn't -that- much content there. I'll probably just try starting over from scratch. Thanks for your help! Also, do you know of any way that I can confirm that the topic of Mentifex is indeed considered proper for Wikipedia, and not inherently prone to another deletion? I'd hate to put effort into recreating the article only to see it deleted again. --NeuronExMachina 20:49, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
-
- If there was a previous AfD (or VfD), I can't find it - it was probably posted on the talk page (as was the custom back then) and lost along with the article. So I don't think it could be deleted as a G4 recreation, because there's nothing to justify it - normally you would run recreations past Wikipedia:Deletion review, but without the deletion discussion they've got nothing to go on as to whether its concerns were met. I think you're pretty much free to create an article, subject to the usual constraints on articles - specifically, notability has to be asserted and verified by reliable third-party sources. I'm not clear on what the subject is, so I can't be more specific. --Sam Blanning(talk) 22:40, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Cool, thanks. --NeuronExMachina 22:42, 14 November 2006 (UTC)