Talk:Network Against Prohibition
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The top half seems to have been writen by a supporter, and the bottom half by a critic, neither sticking to NPOV. Agree? Eivind 08:40, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
The bottom half does seem to be a POV "rebuttal" to the top. But I don't see any obvious POV taint to the top part. The topic is valid, it just needs cleanup. And some sources for claims such as "The main members of the N.A.P organisation are unemployed and rely on the generous unemployment benefits supplied by the Australian Government to enable then to pursue their protest activities." would help. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:18.95.1.13 (talk • contribs).