Talk:Nathan Haselbauer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]
Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on July 20, 2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus.


Looks self-congratulory. David.Monniaux 00:08, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

It certainly did. I've removed the puff and unverified statements, added a link to a sympathetic interview with him, and added a couple of categories. If people need to get information about the society, it has its own page to tell them. Ziggurat 00:12, 7 March 2006 (UTC)


Looks like Nathan Haselbauer wrote this himself- SirCollin

I removed the "popular" adjective in front of "book author". Can anyone find his books in a store? Amirbaraka 20:58, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

They're available at Amazon, it appears. Also you took out all mention of the High IQ Society - if you think that there shouldn't be an entry, nominate it for deletion, but don't just remove it from this article. Ziggurat 21:02, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
The IHIQS should be a part of this article, and it already is. It's in the first sentence. I deleted it because we can click the International High IQ Society link to get more information about it. Why did you delete the work history?Amirbaraka 21:10, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Mainly because "has not earned a paycheck since that time" was unsourced, as well as the information about when he stopped working at M-S. You're right that the other info shouldn't have been removed. Sorry about that. Ziggurat 21:18, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
You're right. That is a bit too harsh. I wanted to show how he is doing well with his organisation. Amirbaraka 21:53, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Suggest merging of this entry to IHIQS article. Individual is not notable enough for separate entry. DaturaS 17:58, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
    • I am in favor of merging the articles for the same reason. Another Wikipedian 21:04, 19 September 2006 (UTC)