National Economic Stabilization And Recovery Act

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is about the legislative tax reform proposal. For the internet based conspiracy theory involving secret laws, white knights, aliens, September 11, and the reworded National Economic Security and Reformation Act, see NESARA Conspiracy Theory.
The neutrality of this article is disputed.
Please see the discussion on the talk page.

The National Economic Stabilization and Recovery Act (or NESARA) is a legislative proposal to reform the fiscal policy, monetary policy, and monetary system of the United States of America. NESARA has no support from current members of the United States Congress. NESARA was authored by Harvey F. Barnard to address the inefficiencies he saw in all three of these areas. As a proposal, NESARA competes as an alternative to other monetary and fiscal policy reform proposals such as the Monetary Reform Act, FairTax, flat tax, and the value added tax. NESARA has not been introduced in the Congress.

Contents

[edit] Summary

NESARA proposes to rewrite current banking rules by abolishing compound interest for secured loans with a repayment schedule. NESARA would allow banks to collect a "monetization fee" for such loans, calculated according to published rules, to be collected after the principal is paid. NESARA proponents claim that banks would then become the public service the proponents believe the banks were meant to be. They argue that today's banks use compound interest equations to exacerbate the gap in wealth between the rich and the poor.

NESARA also proposes a revenue-neutral scrapping of the income tax in favor of a national sales tax, with proponents claiming that a 14% rate would be sufficient. Groceries, leases, rents, medical services, and insurances would be exempt.

Advocates claim NESARA would bring prosperity by improving systems which they claim were initiated with no real precedent or way of predicting the outcome — a Great Depression, rampant inflation, and a continuous cycle of boom and recession. Advocates assert NESARA would replace those systems with something re-designed for a 21st century economy.

[edit] Fiscal Policy Reform

In the area of fiscal policy, NESARA proposes a revenue-neutral reorganization of the existing United States tax system by eliminating the income tax and instituting a national retail sales or excise tax, with proponents claiming a rate of 14% would be sufficient. The tax would be administered by a new National Tax Service and certain items such as groceries, leases, medical services, and insurance would be exempt. Social Security, and Medicare payroll taxes would remain.

Proponents of NESARA claim that the actual public need for these social programs could conceivably drop to the point where they are no longer needed, once the Monetary Reform provisions of the NESARA draft were passed and the benefits they expect materialised.

Opponents claim the NESARA proposal would be regressive on income. The argument is that NESARA would remove the progressive income tax but would leave the regressive payroll tax and then adds a regressive sales tax. Classical economic analysis indicates that the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) decreases as income increases. Households at the lower end of the income scale are spending almost all of their income, while households at the higher end are more likely to devote a portion of income to saving. MPC and income elasticity of demand tends to increase as wealth increases however. In addition, the exemption on life necessities effectively provides a progressive tax on consumption.

Opponents also worry that a federal hybrid system of sales and income taxation would simply add a new form of taxation and would allow for the income tax to redevelop. A hybrid system would add additional expenditures for tax collection and enforcement. In addition, exemptions would add complexity at the same time that the NESARA proposal would leave tax lobbyists the opportunity to seek exclusions and loopholes.

[edit] Monetary Policy Reform

In the area of monetary policy, NESARA proposes fundamental changes to the reserve and lending practices of the commercial banking system, including abolishing compound interest on all secured loans made under a fractional reserve basis in favor of a non-compounded monetization fee, and requiring principal on loans to be paid first before banks collect the monetization fee. The purpose of these changes are to reduce bankruptcies, end bank defaults, and reduce consumer debt service burdens for American citizens. Under these new economic rules, one popular result frequently cited by NESARA proponents is the ability to pay off a typical 30 year mortgage in only 17 years under the new system.[1]

The NESARA institute predicts an economic boom "of Biblical proportions" that would drastically reduce the public need for government welfare programs such as Medicare and Social Security - the last of any existing income taxes under NESARA that could be eliminated once the need for these welfare programs diminish.

[edit] Monetary System Reform

In the area of monetary system reform, NESARA proposes a structural reorganization of United States monetary policy to eliminate inflation altogether, and reduce American public debt. NESARA proposes amending the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 to replace the Federal Reserve System (which NESARA proponents claim is privately owned) with a new government-controlled Treasury Reserve System and the reassignment of its functions and those of the Federal Open Market Committee and Federal Reserve Banks to a new government-controlled Treasury Reserve Board.

In addition, NESARA proposes creation of an additional monetary tool, the Treasury Reserve Account, to more easily control aggregate national inflation and reduce it to zero. NESARA would prohibit banks and other fractional reserve lending institutions from using government securities as reserves—a prohibition which supporters claim would eliminate the growth of the public debt and its effect on inflation. New interest-free Treasury Reserve Notes would be printed to replace Federal Reserve Notes (NESARA proponents claim Federal Reserve notes are "interest-bearing").

For additional accountability between the government and the people, NESARA also makes provisions to reintroduce gold and silver specie as two additional currencies that could compete alongside the Treasury Reserve Note in a free market. Inexplicable minor fluctuations in the value of one currency over another would raise alarm that something was amiss. The public would be able to switch to a different currency and so be able to continue to preserve the value of their exchanges until the situation with the other currency had been sorted out. The federal government would be required to receive treasury credit notes for all transactions, thereby putting pressure on the government to maintain a stable fiat currency. Inflationary pressures on the Treasury Reserve Note itself would be dealt with by the Treasury Reserve Board using, among other tools, the new Treasury Reserve Account to absorb and reflect stored Treasury Reserve Notes into and out of circulation. Minor fluctuations, as well as major fluctuations can now be dealt with using the tools and system that NESARA proposes. Currently the Federal Reserve System is only designed to handle major fluctuations in the value of the Federal Reserve Note, a system some say is an antiquated way of dealing with a 21st century economy that has proven to be more and more sensitive to increasingly minor fluctuations.

[edit] Other indirect effects

Like any policy change, the NESARA proposal would create several effects in other markets:

[edit] Home mortgage interest deduction

The current federal tax law allows individuals to deduct the interest cost on home mortgages. Home mortgage interest is one of the few personal expenditures that is treated in this manner. While most do not itemize the income tax deduction for full benefit, this preferential treatment of mortgage interest encourages households to spend relatively more of their income on housing than would otherwise be the case.

[edit] Charitable giving

Like the home mortgage interest deduction, charitable giving receives preferential treatment under current tax law allowing individuals to deduct donations to certain charities. While most do not itemize the deduction for full benefit, this encourages households to donate more of their income to charity than would otherwise be the case. NESARA advocates state that total philanthropy as a percentage of GDP has held steady at around 2% for at least two decades regardless of changes in income tax deductibility. Proponents claim this economic boost would strengthen charitable giving.

[edit] Black markets

Opponents argue that imposing a national retail sales tax could drive transactions underground, creating a vast black market. This effect can occur for two primary reasons:

  1. Under a retail sales tax system, the purchase of intermediate goods is not taxed, since those goods are supposed to be used to produce a final, retail good that will be fully taxed. Individuals and businesses may be able to manipulate the tax system by claiming that purchases are for intermediate goods, when in fact they are final purchases that should be taxed. At present, however, some business owners overstate business expenses or claim that expenses that are largely or solely personal are business expenses. No income tax would mean no business expense deduction.
  2. The second arises from the use of a retail sales tax rather than a value added tax (VAT). A VAT imposes a tax at every intermediate step of production, so the goods reach the final consumer with much of the tax already implicit in the price. Thus the retail seller has little incentive to conceal retail sales, since he has already paid much of the good's tax. Retailers are unlikely to subsidize the consumer's tax evasion by concealing sales. In contrast, a retailer has paid no tax on goods under a sales tax system. This provides an incentive for retailers to conceal sales and engage in "tax arbitrage" by sharing some of the illicit tax savings with the final consumer.
It is important to note that a VAT and a retail sales tax have no impact on who bears the tax burden. Rather, a VAT conceals most of that burden by distributing it along the value chain. In contrast, a retail sales tax explicitly identifies the entire tax amount on the consumer's receipt, without hiding the embedded tax in the price of the good or service. Both tax structures distribute the tax burden between the consumer and producer depending on a specific product's supply and demand characteristics.

Proponents respond to the black market argument by pointing out that, whereas tax evasion under the current income tax system requires only one person (the payor) to lie on their tax forms, sales tax evasion under NESARA requires collusion of both the payor (the retail purchaser) and the payee (the retail seller).

[edit] Illegal immigration

The current system of taxation, in many cases, provides incentives for illegal immigrants and companies that employ them. It is estimated that approximately 5 million illegal immigrants are paid off the books in cash allowing employee and employer to avoid paying federal taxes estimated at $35 billion a year. Under NESARA, illegal immigrants would pay the national sales tax on non-necessity items allowing for partial collection of this lost revenue. Due to the NESARA burden, wage increases would be required for illegal immigrants to retain the same buying power. This would allow Americans to more effectively compete for jobs held by illegal immigrants.

[edit] Underground economy

Supporters state that underground or illegal economic activity is largely untaxed under the current tax system. Economists estimate that the underground economy in the United States exceeds $1 trillion annually. By imposing a sales tax, underground economic activity will be taxed when proceeds from such activity are spent on legal consumption. For example, the sale of illegal narcotics will remain untaxed, but drug dealers will face taxation when they use drug proceeds to buy consumer goods. By taxing this previously untaxed money, NESARA supporters state the underground economy will be paying what would otherwise be uncollected income taxes.

[edit] Border adjustable

Unlike the current system or a flat tax, the NESARA would provide a level of border-adjustability. The NESARA would remove the embedded tax component of the federal income tax that is present in the prices of goods and services. American exports would benefit as the sales tax is removed at the border. Domestic products would be more competitive with foreign imports as the sales tax component is added to these products. Such a system would greatly benefit the global competitiveness of U.S. products.

[edit] Criticisms and quotes

[edit] Notes

  • By redefining the common definition of currency as representing debt and not wealth, Dr. Barnard set out to design an engineered solution to believed inefficiencies in the fiscal policy, monetary policy, and monetary system of the United States; and NESARA is the solution to his final analysis.[2]
  • NESARA proponents claim that if all provisions of the bill become law, the standard of living for Americans will double within 20 years.[3]

[edit] External links

[edit] See also

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../n/a/t/National_Economic_Stabilization_And_Recovery_Act_5e6c.html"
In other languages