Wikipedia:Naming conventions (astronomical objects)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
The following is a proposed Wikipedia policy, guideline, or process. The proposal may still be in development, under discussion, or in the process of gathering consensus for adoption (which is not achieved through simple majority voting). References or links to this page should not describe it as "policy".
This policy in a nutshell This policy in a nutshell:
This (proposed) guideline gives guidance on the names that should be used for articles on astronomical objects, including stars and dwarf planets. Common names should be used where these are popular or otherwise the official names. Where there is a conflict between official names, a hierarchy of preference should be used according to the most common naming system. Redirect articles should be used wherever possible.

Contents

[edit] General guidelines

The policy Wikipedia:Naming conventions states:

Generally, article naming should give priority to what the majority of English speakers would most easily recognize, with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity, while at the same time making linking to those articles easy and second nature. Names of Wikipedia articles should be optimized for readers over editors; and for a general audience over specialists.

[edit] Common names

Common names should be used for article names in preference to official names where these are widely used and are unambiguous.

[edit] Reference information on astronomical names

The SIMBAD website and the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) are both professional astronomy resources that can be used to check for accepted alternate designations for individual objects, including traditional names. However, neither website necessarily lists the designations in the order of most common use; the criteria below must still be applied. Note that SIMBAD countains broad information on objects inside and outside the Milky Way whereas NED primarily contains information on extragalactic objects (i.e. objects outside the Milky Way). Therefore, it is recommended that SIMBAD be used for checking the names of objects primarily within the Milky Way and that both SIMBAD and NED be used for checking names for objects outside the Milky Way. Also note that neither website contains any information on objects within the Solar System.

[edit] Disambiguation

In general, the official name of an object should be used (e.g. Jupiter). If another object shares a name with something more notable, the type of object should follow in parentheses. (e.g. Mercury (planet))

[edit] Capitalisation

As per the guideline Wikipedia:Naming conventions (capitalization), where a word such as "Group", "Cluster" or "Star" is part of the object's proper name, this should be capitalised in the article title.

[edit] Specific guidelines

[edit] Dwarf planets

As per the consensus established at Talk: Dwarf planet/Naming, the official name should be used for the article title. In situations where there are other notable objects sharing the same name, the disambiguation term "dwarf planet" should be used in parentheses after the name. An example of this would be Eris (dwarf planet). Regardless of the article title, the MPC catalogue number/name designation should be referenced in the lead sentence. Syntax of this is still debated, but should incorporate a link to the minor planet number article.

[edit] Asteroids

Articles about asteroids and other small solar system bodies (not including comets, which are addressed below) should be named as follows;

  1. For bodies which have received official naming from the Minor Planet Center, the article title should be the object's official minor planet number without parentheses, followed by its name e.g. 4 Vesta.
  2. Where a body has not yet received an official name, but has received a minor planet number, the article title should be the object's official minor planet number in parentheses, followed by the object's provisional designation. This provisional designation is usually the object's discovery year, followed by an alphanumeric code signifying exactly when within the year it was discovered e.g. (15760) 1992 QB1. Any use of the name other than the title should use proper subscripting, using the provided templates {{mp}} and {{mpl}} (e.g. {{mpl|(15760) 1992 QB|1}} yielding (15760) 1992 QB1).
  3. Where as body has neither received an official name nor minor planet number, the article's title should simply be the object's provisional designation as described above e.g. 2004 JG6 (written {{mp|2004 JG|6}} yielding 2004 JG6).

Unofficial nicknames should not be used as article titles.

[edit] Natural satellites of small solar system bodies

(tbc)

[edit] Comets

Articles about comets should be named in the following preference.

  1. For extremely famous comets which have no issues with disambiguation, these should be titled "Comet <name>", e.g. Comet Halley.
  2. Other comets should be referred by their official designation in the new-style format (post 1994). This is usually;
  • For numbered periodic comets; its periodic comet number, followed by P/ if still an active comet and D/ for comets which have broken up or been lost, then the name of the discoverer or co-discoverers separated by hyphens (with no space between the forward-slash and the name(s)). e.g. 153P/Ikeya-Zhang
  • For unnumbered comets; P/ for periodic, C/ for comets in hyperbolic orbits, D/ for comets which have been destroyed and X/ for comets for which no reliable orbit has been calculated, followed by the year of discovery, then an alphanumeric code which describes when in the year the comet was discovered, then the name should be in parentheses. e.g. C/2001 Q4 (NEAT)

Note that as comets are named after their discoverer or discoverers, and that those people may discover more than one comet, using the 1st option above, i.e. "Comet <Name>" may be ambiguous in some circumstances. E.g. Comet Hyakutake may refer to C/1995 Y1 (Hyakutake) or C/1996 B2 (Hyakutake), although only latter became widely known. Care must therefore be taken if using only the first option above to avoid ambiguity.

[edit] Stars

Articles on stars should be named with the following preferences:

  1. Traditional name where approved by International Astronomical Union and where this is more widely used than any other name
  2. Otherwise, the Bayer designation
  3. If there is no Bayer designation, then the Flamsteed designation
  4. If there is no Bayer or Flamsteed designation then the Henry Draper Catalogue number
  5. If there is no Bayer, Flamsteed or HD number then the most widely recognised other name

[edit] Exoplanet (Extra-solar planets)

Exoplanets should be referred to by the star name as taken from the star article title (e.g. Upsilon Andromedae, 54 Piscium), followed by the planet designation as given in the scientific literature, which in most (though not all) cases is a lower case Roman letter starting from "b" in order of discovery.

Unofficial nicknames, such as "Bellerophon" (for 51 Pegasi b) should not be used except for a mention in the article.

[edit] Galaxies

Articles on galaxies should be named according to the following criteria (in order of preferences):

  1. Traditional name where approved by the International Astronomical Union and where this is widely used in general or professional literature (e.g. the Andromeda Galaxy)
  2. The Messier object number (e.g. Messier 30)
  3. The New General Catalogue number (e.g. NGC 1)
  4. Any relatively unusual catalog name that is widely used in general or professional literature and that is more commonly used than the IC or UGC number (e.g. Arp 220, Mrk 33)
  5. The Index Catalogue number (e.g. IC 2)
  6. The Uppsala General Catalogue number (e.g. UGC 1)
  7. The most commonly used scientific designation given by any other catalog

Note that traditional galaxy names are proper nouns. Therefore, all the words in the galaxy name should begin with capital letters. For example, "Andromeda Galaxy" is acceptable, but "Andromeda galaxy" is not.

[edit] Groups and clusters of galaxies

Articles of groups and clusters of galaxies should be named according to the following criteria (in order of preference):

  1. Traditional name where approved by the International Astronomical Union and where this is widely used in general or professional literature (e.g. the Local Group, Virgo Cluster, Stephan's Quintet)
  2. Name based on the brightest galaxy in the group when that name is commonly used for identification (e.g. the M81 Group); this is only applicable to groups of galaxies within approximately 50 Mpc
  3. The most commonly-used catalog number (e.g. Abell 3266)

Note that group and cluster names are proper nouns. Therefore, all the words in the galaxy name should begin with capital letters. For example, "Virgo Cluster" is acceptable, but "Virgo cluster" is not.

[edit] See also

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../n/a/m/Wikipedia%7ENaming_conventions_%28astronomical_objects%29_5966.html"