User talk:Myspaceaddictaust
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Myspaceaddictaust, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair 14:39, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Edit summaries
Hi. Could you please use more edit summaries. It's considered an important guideline on Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. They are useful for several reasons - they help other editors understand what changes are being made, and why. They help to filter out vandalism (this is especially true for IP editors). And they also help focus the editor on what they are trying to achieve, so we don't end up with page histories full of endless minor tweaks. See the help page for more information. Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 08:41, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] what should be changed
- get rid of the top friends despair thing, or if you have to make it a one-sentence criticism
- Don't use MySpace International becuase that's not a well-publicized, important name
- censorship-blocking
- o surveys and chain bulleitins, since they aren't important.
i gotta go, so good luck -- Chris chat edits essays 12:35, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- I give up. Just keep on messing up the article when its unprotected, reverting everybody else's attempt at change and treating them like newbies. Nevermind that you get to mkae all the cahnges you want but 1000-edit tireless contributors have to clear them with you, the owner of the article. I should really start a WP:RfC. -- Chris chat edits essays 13:33, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Things you should read before reverting me
WP:OR, WP:NOT, WP:OWN. Now please, don't revert; discuss cahnges. If you think my edit scuks, too bad. you don't own the article. -- Chris chat edits essays 13:58, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 3RR/SOCK
Hi. I have reported you for WP:3RR at WP:AN/3RR, and alleged that you are a sockpuppet of the blocked user User:Pnatt. Have a nice day. -- zzuuzz (talk) 15:23, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 3RR Block
You have been blocked for eight hours for violating the three revert rule. Please familiarise yourself with the rule and respect it when you return. --Robdurbar 16:32, 8 September 2006 (UTC)