User talk:Myrockstar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Contents

[edit] Welcome!

Hello, Myrockstar, and welcome to Wikipedia! I am CTSWyneken. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Again, welcome! And if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask. --CTSWyneken(talk) 22:02, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Nicole-richie-vanity-fair04ll.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nicole-richie-vanity-fair04ll.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:06, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Please do not claim that this image has no restrictions on its use. This is blatantly false. --Yamla 17:10, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Deleting comments on talk pages

Please do not delete comments made by others on talk pages, especially if they are part of a discussion thread (see Talk:Angelina Jolie. This is against Wikipedia rules and might be interpreted by some as vandalism. Also, please sign your comments using 4 ~ symbols ( ~~~~ ) which will add your username and the date. Otherwise standard practise is to ignore them. 23skidoo 13:15, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

This message is regarding the page User talk:Myrockstar. Please stop. If you continue to blank pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Yamla 23:38, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Spam

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. The links you added to the page Brad Pitt have been removed. Please do not add commercial links—or links to your own private websites—to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Yamla 17:08, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Please stop adding commercial links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. This is in reference to you adding a link to MySpace on Paris Hilton. --Yamla 14:52, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright violations

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Image:Nicole-richie-vanity-fair04ll.jpg article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! --Yamla 17:11, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Image:9133222-9133228-slarge.jpg article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! --Yamla 17:11, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] More Pictures

You said: "For the images of Brad Pitt, Nicole Richie, and Peter Wentz. I have seen many other images been acceptable from magazine prints, the Brad Pitt Image shouldn't even be in question because it is a movie still, a movie is something that ANYONE can own. Peter Wentz has no picture, and it is important for him to have a head shot on his article. Nicole Richie also has no pictures, and that Vanity Fair article was an important event on her life, if you feel that what I chose as the copyright is incorrect, then please change it, or make a note of it, but you shouldn't have removed the images. thank you."

Your license tags were blatantly false. Also, you cannot just use scans from the insides of magazines. Such images are not permitted on Wikipedia. Additionally, you have not been providing the detailed fair-use rationale required for fair-use images. I encourage you to read up some more on image copyright before uploading any more images. Thanks. --Yamla 17:27, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thank you, Myrockstar, for Image:Smithb01.jpg. You did a good job with that and I'm happy to see you settling in nicely to Wikipedia. Well done. --Yamla 02:01, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright violation

You recently uploaded Image:Wmagcovbrad.JPG and added it to the article on Brad Pitt. This is not fair-use for that article, however, as the image may only be used to illustrate the publication of the issue of the magazine in question. As the article on Brad Pitt doesn't even mention this magazine even once, this image may not be used in the article. --Yamla 04:08, 5 July 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Stjr.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Stjr.JPG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 04:13, 5 July 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Tpgracesnl.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tpgracesnl.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 04:15, 5 July 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Tpgrace.jpg)

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Tpgrace.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Yamla 04:15, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright violation

I reverted your edits to Playgirl. As you know, adding a copyrighted image without providing an acceptable fair-use rationale is a copyright violation. --Yamla 04:17, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Was just moving the image to playgirl since I deleted it from Brad Pitt didn't want to offend the person who uploaded it.Myrockstar 05:38, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Besides if you said it yourself on the image "Image may ONLY be used to illustrate the publication of the issue in question. It may not be used to illustrate the magazine generally and may not be used solely to depict the actor in question. " Why was it removed from the Playgirl article where it clearly makes mention of it. Myrockstar 07:54, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Playgirl

You said: "Was just moving the image to playgirl since I deleted it from Brad Pitt didn't want to offend the person who uploaded it. Besides if you said it yourself on the image "Image may ONLY be used to illustrate the publication of the issue in question. It may not be used to illustrate the magazine generally and may not be used solely to depict the actor in question. " Why was it removed from the Playgirl article where it clearly makes mention of it."

While there is no doubt that the image would be appropriate on the article about Playgirl, it does need a detailed fair-use rationale. You are right that the article makes explicit mention of that particular issue. --Yamla 15:28, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Wmagcovbrad.JPG

You said: "There is now a mention of the notable event for which I intended to use the image in question on the article of Brad Pitt."

That looks good to me. You have done a good job, Myrockstar. --Yamla 15:28, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Nrview.jpg

You said: "You said "Was being used to depict person, not to talk about that episode of The View."" Thats exactly right, I used to image to depict Nicole Richie and not the episode of the view. If I am wrong in putting the image, please direct me to the place where it says it's only correct to use an image of a television show to talk about the show itself."

Sure. See Image:Nrview.jpg. The license itself says "for identification and critical commentary on the station ID or the program and its contents". Note specifically that it does NOT allow you to use it solely to depict the person involved, as it was being used. You could place the image lower down in the page, attached to a section which specifically discusses her appearance on The View. But you cannot use it as the main image depicting Ms. Richie. --Yamla 15:28, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Again, thanks

Myrockstar, I just want to say that it is refreshing to see an editor like you make an honest attempt to use images according to copyright. While you have made a few mistakes here and there, you are not getting angry when these are pointed out and you are clearly working hard to understand what the heck I'm talking about. Thank you, I appreciate it. --Yamla 15:29, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] No problem

That is no problem to redirect into SexyBack after used search box. So, you can test it again. Aleenf1 05:53, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sign your posts on talk pages

Please sign your name using four tildes ~~~~ when making your posts. Invitatious 15:21, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] W Magazine Cover

We obviously have a difference of opinions here. Where Kate Moss is probably the ultimate representation of the magazine, where the editors/writers/photographers themselves have all stated so and Britney Spears just doesn't fit with the High Fashion idea. If you don't like this particular cover than I will switch it up with one of the other 28. I could still somehow include the Britney shot around there if you really love it so much. Bang Bang you're Dead

One other Kate Moss cover you mean? My image has no more fair use than yours. Also, I know what a "typical" cover of W magazine looks like and it's just ridiculous for you to think a cover with Britney Spears is it. Clearly, this is about your pov, when mine is based off fact. Where you probably are Britney lover, I simply want the magazine to be represented right. Bang Bang you're Dead
It is very very common for the covers to not be white and the makeup to not be dramatic. I could give numerous examples. I am not a Kate lover as you say, I just happen to know a bit b/c I love and know the magazine! Bang Bang you're Dead
Yes, that sounds like the best idea. I'll look around now for better references and the like. Bang Bang You're Dead 20:34, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your GA nomination

Please make sure to provide a helpful edit summary (per the instructions and big red box) when editing the nominations list in future. This will help us keep the Good Articles wikiproject running more efficiently. Thanks.  -- Run!  11:21, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Britneylo 4.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Britneylo 4.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:05, 23 September 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Smithb01.jpg)

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Smithb01.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ResurgamII 20:32, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Signature

Hi, Myrockstar. Here's a signature for you: Myrockstar Hope you like it! •Sean•gorter•(Talk) 08:50, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Britney Spears Article

What's with deleting the section about Paris Hilton? That is all true with sources and it is actual news. Searches for those pics are crashing the tabloid sites all around the world.

[edit] Template:Britney Spears

COuld u stop reverting my version in your version, the template I created is basically the new version of the templates here at Wikipedia it have a hide button, it's smaller and it's doesn't look bad as yours. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hotwiki (talk • contribs) 07:20, 13 December 2006 (UTC).

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../m/y/r/User_talk%7EMyrockstar_5cfa.html"