Talk:MXit
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I am a mxit user. I am addicted to it. Parents, save your children from this virus. It is for their own good.lol —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 165.146.160.125 (talk • contribs).
- Same here. MXit is evil... --Scotteh 15:34, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Does anyone think it might be relevant to mention that users can chat to MXit members on any standard Jabber client? --196.31.127.21 12:58, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- I've made a note that you can use the mxit java applet on a pc via mpowerplayer.
- Did you guys know you can also invite mxit users on client like Google Talk, using the email +27<cell_number>@mxit.co.za ... not sure where to put it though.
- I've added this under Hardware Requirements, feel free to move / edit it. --Serlank 05:26, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
- Did you guys know you can also invite mxit users on client like Google Talk, using the email +27<cell_number>@mxit.co.za ... not sure where to put it though.
I'm a bit concerned with the lack of information on the mxit page. I think that certain things there about protection minors is inaccurate. There has been a lot of media coverage regarding users who use pass URL's to pornography via MXit's infrastructure.
JENCA MXIT !
This article needs to be completely rewritten, it reads like a user manual instead of a encyclopedia entry. I'm removing the chat room commands and smilies from the article. Jediwannabe 10:07, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Bias
Someone should edit or remove the Benefits of using MXit section, as it reads like one of the employers of MXit wrote it in the form of advertisement. Except for that, the section as a whole is clearly entirely biased towards the MXit application. --Adriaan90 13:50, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Anonymous Chatting
Is the section about the anonimity of MXit really revelant? In this way it is no different whatsoever to almost every single chatroom in existence. Can I remove this then please?
Stuart Steedman 13:30, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Go ahead if you ask me. I totally agree with your logic behind the subject. --Adriaan90 17:43, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Done. Thank you. If anyone believes this to be in error, please motivate on this page. Ta. Stuart Steedman 19:21, 25 October 2006 (UTC)