Talk:Mutual Broadcasting System

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is supported by the Radio WikiProject.

This project provides a central approach to Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia.
Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

Anon, thanks for the work. It looks like your sources were much more detailed than mine. I had been under the impression that the Quality Network lasted longer.

What was the arrangement (if any) between the stations in the years inbetween the demise of Quality and the start of Mutual? I was under the impression they continued sharing programing, is this false? -- Infrogmation 04:44 7 Jul 2003 (UTC)

I rolled back an anonymous contribution that discussed the quality of the article within the article, someone should edit and incorporate the accurate and relevant bits and make sure it comports with encyclopedia standards. dml 13:47, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Mutual Broadcasting Company

I have failed to establish exactly what the relation was between Mutual Broadcasting Company and Mutual Broadcasting System, but they seem to be used interchangeably, so I made Mutual Broadcasting Company a redirect. Algae 12:21, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mutual Broadcasting System

Suggest inclusion of several other Mutual Broadcasting System citations, sample scripts, recordings and/or links, including, at the least:

[edit] Listen To

Jerry Haendiges also posts a few Mutual Broadcasting System episodes each month, but they're not permanent links.

[edit] Mutual Broadcasting System Logo

The Mutual Radio Graphic at the top of the page is copywritten work from The Digital Deli Online www.digitaldeliftp.com. Please credit it appropriately or remove it. The original can be found at this link: Original MBS Artwork from The Digital Deli Online

Following message left with anonymous editor:
You identified a source for the graphic in the lede of Mutual Broadcasting System as the Digital Deli Online. The image page (Image:Mutua.jpg) however gives a different source: Radio Timeline. I'm happy to enter an appropriate credit in the image's caption area on the article page, but I need to know on what basis you identify the source as Digital Deli rather than the other website as the original source.

DCGeist 22:18, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

The "basis" is that I produced the graphic myself. Furthermore, my website is copyright protected. Even further, I possess the only original PhotoShop and Illustrator graphic files from which it was produced. You may have noticed the 'khaki' background employed in the graphic, which was derived from the matting I applied to the graphic for my own copyright protected website, The Digital Deli Online. How far do you wish to take this? I defy you to obtain the original basis for the graphic from the cited source. Your turn. . . .
Here's a unique idea. . . . How about asking the orginal submitter to provide his or her provenances for the graphic?? Interesting concept, no? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.170.239.56 (talkcontribs) 12:05, 3 December 2006 (UTC).
I got it from Radio Timeline, as noted. It looks similar to the DD pic because I altered it with Photoshop to have a solid background. Since the inherent graphic components suggest that Radio Timeline probably got it from DD, I suggest we remove it and locate one of the other images to upper right. Pepso 15:44, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Similar my butt. It's my specific graphic, including the original font I altered to as closely approximate the original Mutual Broadcasting System font as practical. Radio Timeline apparently chose not to attribute it to me. So you wish to simply compound the error now? Here's where most of the graphics that are pilfered from my site come from. There's no point in compounding the thievery by deceit. All I ask is that you credit it appropriately. Or how's this? I simply sue to protect my copyright. What's your pleasure? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.170.239.56 (talkcontribs) 18:32, 3 December 2006 (UTC).