User talk:Muéro
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
1 2 |
Contents |
[edit] huh?
i believe that i've been pretty good on that. dposse 00:41, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
- thats because most of my edits are small, like spelling, grammar, ect. Any big edits (moving sections, deleting stuff) i provide a summary for. anyway, i dont see what the big deal is. even if i don't do a summary, you can always see what i edited in the history. dposse 13:10, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] vandalism to tie domi
i appreciate your concerns about my "vandalism" of tie domi article .... i do not agree with you. i stated the truth .... please explain how that constitutes vandalism. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.24.147.126 (talk • contribs) 01:51, 4 October, 2006 (UTC).
[edit] George Radanovich
Thanks for fixing Congress Radanovich's page. What did you think of my improvements I made on the original page?Mrsmart 04:31, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] My RfA
Thank you for supporting my RfA and for understanding what I was saying with the answers to the questions!
Atlant 12:58, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
- Well, it's been a week now that I've been an administrator and I'd like to take this moment to once again thank everyone who supported my RfA, and to let you all know that I don't think I've screwed anything up yet so I hope I'm living up to everyone's expectations for me. But if I ever fall short of those expectations, I'd certainly welcome folks telling me about it!
- Atlant 14:28, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] hockey player infoboxes
Why do you keep reverting my edits? The infobox I switched to for the Wayne Gretzky, Gordie Howe, etc. articles has been adjusted to be applicable for both current and retired players. --207.69.137.200 15:40, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Do NOT edit my talk page
I have told you before not to edit my talk page. I will file a complaint of harrasment if you continue to falsify information in an attempt to villify me (see your sock puppetry accusation for details). Jaskaramdeep 17:42, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
- Regarding the above statement, the sockpuppetry was confirmed, which resulted in a block. Addhoc 23:53, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- what block? 68.149.157.248 06:07, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
- You were blocked for 48 hours, see 68.149.157.248 (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log). Addhoc 11:43, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
- lol, I didn't even notice that (probably because I don't volunteer every waking moment of my time to a site that gives me nothing in return, unlike some others.... *cough* *cough*) I do find it odd that you're watching this talk page though, with responses hours after I change, even though the user whose talk page it is hasn't responded yet. I think that this might not be a Wikipedia relationship between you two - either you are friends outside of Wikipedia, or are the same person. In any case, don't expect me to waste half a day writing up a complaint on you two (or one??) 68.149.157.248 15:52, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
- I'm Muéro's advocate... Addhoc 16:09, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
- this is very interesting, actually. it's a chicken or the egg scenario. are you watching over him like a hawk because you accepted his case, or did you accept his case because you're fiends with him/are him? It's very easy to get an anonymous IP through a router or proxy server. It is strange that you would defend him so vehemently in ways that do not relate at all to the initial case you accepted. 68.149.157.248 20:44, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
- I'm Muéro's advocate... Addhoc 16:09, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
- lol, I didn't even notice that (probably because I don't volunteer every waking moment of my time to a site that gives me nothing in return, unlike some others.... *cough* *cough*) I do find it odd that you're watching this talk page though, with responses hours after I change, even though the user whose talk page it is hasn't responded yet. I think that this might not be a Wikipedia relationship between you two - either you are friends outside of Wikipedia, or are the same person. In any case, don't expect me to waste half a day writing up a complaint on you two (or one??) 68.149.157.248 15:52, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
- You were blocked for 48 hours, see 68.149.157.248 (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log). Addhoc 11:43, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
- what block? 68.149.157.248 06:07, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- Oh wow, I really stumbled onto something today, didn't I? If this was a movie, you would be slowly backing away, hoping nobody saw your flub. I finally realize why you said "oh, I totally agree" when Muero presented heaps of false information, while ignoring EVERY one of my concern with him/you, lol. Well, all I can say is leave my Hemsky article alone, and we'll be square 68.149.157.248 21:18, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
-
- I have six advocacy cases open and seven mediation-cabal cases. This case hasn't gone to RfC or arbitration yet, and the sockpuppetry report was filed by Muéro, so I've been more involved in other cases. Since I've been editing Wikipedia, I've been accused of being Australian, American, Indian and British. Also been accused of being a creationist, a skeptic and the founder of a new religious movement. Also being a POV pusher for pacifism and a supporter of human rights violations committed by the LTTE and the Sri Lankan Government. None of this impresses me. Addhoc 22:49, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
- In other random news, I've got a pet dog, two hockey sticks in my bedroom, I like to ride the early bus in the morning so I don't get late for school, I enjoy the odd pizza now and then...... What's your point? That you're a busy sockpuppet? You have my sympathy, I guess 68.149.157.248 00:26, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- I have six advocacy cases open and seven mediation-cabal cases. This case hasn't gone to RfC or arbitration yet, and the sockpuppetry report was filed by Muéro, so I've been more involved in other cases. Since I've been editing Wikipedia, I've been accused of being Australian, American, Indian and British. Also been accused of being a creationist, a skeptic and the founder of a new religious movement. Also being a POV pusher for pacifism and a supporter of human rights violations committed by the LTTE and the Sri Lankan Government. None of this impresses me. Addhoc 22:49, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
-
- Oh wow, I really stumbled onto something today, didn't I? If this was a movie, you would be slowly backing away, hoping nobody saw your flub. I finally realize why you said "oh, I totally agree" when Muero presented heaps of false information, while ignoring EVERY one of my concern with him/you, lol. Well, all I can say is leave my Hemsky article alone, and we'll be square 68.149.157.248 21:18, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
[edit] Alexander Ovechkin article
From Talk:Alexander Ovechkin, I gather that Jaskaramdeep isn't exactly a reformed character yet. Addhoc 23:57, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Animated GIFs
Hi, I was wondering, how do you create these animations? I saw Image:water4.gif, and thought it was ace. - Jack (talk) 00:34, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] AMA
Should I close this case... Addhoc 11:40, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
- I'll close the case. Addhoc 12:33, 30 November 2006 (UTC)