Template talk:MOS CPU

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Why WDC should be mentioned in this template

I included the logo of, and a link to, WDC in the template heading, since WDC is a major (the only?) developer of significant improvements to the 65xx CPU range, and still manufacturing processors and microcontrollers (mostly the latter) with the 65xx architecture. I also moved the 65802 and 816 items to the end, since those are 1) 16-bit, and 2) the latest models in the range.

To better the look of the template I'll try and make similarly-sized versions of the two logos. --Wernher 23:12, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

That's fine by me. Thanks for your efforts in this matter. Crotalus horridus 00:45, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

You're welcome. But I guess it remains to be seen how thankful you'll be for my vote in the pending TFD case... BTW, the fixing of similarly-sized logos goes for the 65xx processors template as well. --Wernher 03:54, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Which template(s) to use

Re: the TFD vote mentioned in Wernher's 13 Dec comment in the previous thread:

I don't take any of this personally (I hope you don't take it as a personal insult or anything that I nominated your template for deletion; you've done some good work on the MOS chip pages). Hopefully we can work out something that is mutually agreeable and looks good. Crotalus horridus 04:39, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

No problemo, I generally appreciate sincere efforts to improve the coverage of fields of common interest. Let's see what people think/vote, and consider making changes to the template design if necessary. --Wernher 01:03, 14 December 2005 (UTC)