User talk:Morgan Leigh/Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Gangs

Hello Morgan. The problem is that the reference is by the gang itself, and thus may not be considered to reliable, and perhaps not encyclopedic. I will post this to Australian WIkipedian noticeboard to garner more opinions. Thanks, Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 03:11, 14 June 2006 (UTC).

Hi there, I didn't realise that you had posted here until after i had replied to you (see your talk page). I expected any reply to be on the relevant subject talk page. It was only because you hadn't posted to the subject talk page that I posted on your talk page. I hope you have read my comments on your talk page. A couple of questions; What makes you think that the link to the gang's page was added by a gang member? Even if this reference was added by a gang member why does this lessen its validity?

Morgan Leigh 03:20, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

The problem is that the information verfiying the gang is by the gang itself. I'm not saying that you are a gang member, supporter or sympathizer.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 03:24, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

I did not suggest that you did mean to say that I was in any way affilated with this gang. You didn't answer the question as to what it was that made you think that the info verifying the gang was posted by a gang member? Neither did you answer why it was that if this was the case it made the information any less valid. That's like saying that if I am in a given political party and I add a link to that party's web site then that info is not valid.

Morgan Leigh 05:14, 14 June 2006 (UTC)