User talk:Monkeykiss

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Monkeykiss, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- Longhair 03:02, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Contents 1 test 2 User Page 3 Thanks 4 Zeusophobia 5 Please? 6 Unsigned 7 Buddha - God or Man 8 calm down on atheist talk.

[edit] test

''[['' test '']]''

[edit] User Page

I believe one of your headings should read "My Interests" and not, "By Interests", or am I wrong?Gagueci 18:02, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for noticing that. You are correct ini that. I'll fix it now. Monkey Brain 21:43, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Haha, your welcome. You know, I do have to "vandalize" once in a while. :) QuizQuick 02:31, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Say, how come you have a userbox that says you don't like pastel colours?

Notice the whole list of colors that I like(every color), and don't like(every color). lol, I thought it was a funny thing to have, sometimes randomness is activity is a neat feature to life. Monkey Brain_(talk) 02:35, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Zeusophobia

No such disease. It is a joke. There are plenty of bogus phobias in the 'net. Unless you provide a reputable reference, they have no place in wikipedia, see wikipedia:Verifiability and wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. `'mikka (t) 05:40, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Answered in my talk page. `'mikka (t) 06:21, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Please?

Can you support my article Goldfish as a featured article? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_articles

Thanks! QuizQuick 21:18, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Aw..thanks for passing it! How did you do it by the way? I thought only mods could pass articles..lol. QuizQuick 01:22, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

• Well, thanks again. :) QuizQuick 01:25, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unsigned

Hi Monkeykiss,

I noticed you using the {{unsigned}} template on one of your own comments. In general, the unsigned template is intended for clarifying another user's comment on a talk page, when its one of your own comments that you have just forgotten to sign, its as easy to just copy in your own signature and timestamp as a followup edit. Also when using the {unsigned} template to sign another newbie user's comment, its a good idea to use the substitution form .... {{subst:unsigned|someuser|sometimestamp}} .... so that the template becomes permanently substituted. -- Solipsist 21:30, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

coo! I was just in a hurrying at school. Thanks for the info. Monkey Brain_(talk) 01:36, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

• Hallo Monkeykiss. Thanks very much for wikifying my User's Page. It looks much better now - thanks to your attentions! All the best to you. From Tony. TonyMPNS 22:05, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Buddha - God or Man

Hi. I was a bit perturbed by this decision; I didn't make it easily. I counted 4 votes 'keep' out of 17 total votes. If it had been 4 out of 16 (ie 75% in favour of deletion) I would have deleted.

I thought it better to keep and let someone nominate it again, rather than make a controversial delete. Wikipedia:Deletion_guidelines_for_administrators says 'When in doubt, don't delete' in bold. - Richardcavell 01:25, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] calm down on atheist talk.

Please refrain from starting a new topic about a user (see here), this is a bit uncivil. I have not accused you of anything, and have been polite in every way. I did not state lies about you, I simply reminded you that the "invisible comments" could be construed as vandalizing (see here); you were starting a debate in the actual article. The debate in question has already been resolved, there was no need to extenuate it. Additionally I was not being uncivil, stating my view is not uncivil, but rather how you state it, again this has already been resolved. Somerset219 23:14, 2 August 2006 (UTC)