Talk:Monique Alexander

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]
Votes for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on 2005-07-18. The result of the discussion was keep.

The new photo is certainly provocative, but might need to be trimmed to adhere to Wikipedia's guidelines. ?

I agree that the new image is more than is needed for WP's uses. In the next week, I can try to expand the article and find a more suitable bio pic. Olessi 17:17, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

Additional sources: [1], [2]. Olessi 19:40, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

  • I prefer the Resident Sex pic for the lead - it looks more typical of this actress, and shows both body and face. BD2412 T 22:59, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
I am inclined to agree. With several other actress articles, I have looked through their DVD covers to find a clear picture of their head, and then edited the image with photoshop to just show the face. I did not find any clear pictures of this actress, which is why I stuck with just uploading the new DVD covers. Olessi 23:02, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Removed unsourced information

The following information was not cited as per WP policy. A verifiable source needs to be included for this content:

Monique has honored herself, her body, and her fans by allowing her perfect all-natural body to be tattooed. She had had a small star tattooed on her foot some time ago, but she has recently added two significantly larger tattoos. These tattoos are both cartoon kitties--one on the back of her neck, and the other on the lower left side of her belly.

>>Can you say 'obsessed fan'? That paragraph was obviously typed with one hand.


Obviously, if the information cannot be cited appropriately then it cannot be added into this entry. If there are any questions, you are free to bring them up to me or anyone else of your choosing. Thank you. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud 09:13, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Okay, I've provided photographic proof of my claim. I'm sure these photos have no copyright, but I don't know how to assert that on Wikipedia so they won't be deleted in a week's time. Anybody care to correct my work to make it more permanent?

  • How, exactly, can you be sure the photos have no copyright? Whoever took them has a right to them, even if they are mundane. Where did you find them? BD2412 T 01:43, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
  • By the way, a verifiable source need not be actual photos - a link to a website where the tats are visible would do. BD2412 T 01:44, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

I provided the URL's when I uploaded these photos--I urge you to go check it out!

Having done so, I am completely unconvinced that these are actually images of Monique Alexander. For one thing, I can not find a single picture or series of pictures that are identifiably her, and which feature these tattoos. BD2412 T 05:55, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
A myspace website - which could belong to anyone - is simply not convincing. There's no way to tell that's Monique from those pics, and there are no pics clearly showing her with any tats. I've removed the info again for now. BD2412 T 06:13, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

I have placed a few "citations needed" in this article. Every alteration I have ever made to this article has been correct and factual, yet numerous users here are intent on attacking my contributions, and altering or removing them until I prove them true--and they have all been proven true, I might add. Some of you have finally admitted this and extensively reworked my contributions after you found out I was right. Rather than vandalize my contributions, why don't you check it out first? I don't understand why I am being singled out, and I don't appreciate it. I insist on the same standard for everyone else here too--but rather than vandalize, I merely inserted a "citation needed". I question especially the assertion made about a film entitled "Lexie and Monique Love Evan". As Lexie Marie is no longer with Vivid, this seems unlikely to me, unless Vivid has left it in the can for a very long time (which I admit they sometimes do). I am wondering if the contributor is not mistakenly trying to cite "Lexie and Monique Love Rocco", with Rocco Siffredi, instead. And as for the person who cut down my list of Monique's filmography, I have a question for you. On what basis did you choose the titles you let remain? If you cannot provide some rational basis for cutting it down to those particular titles (and just saying "it was too long" is not a rationale), then leave the damn thing alone! GnatsFriend

  • Unfortunately, "too long" is a valid statement. If you look at the Filmographies section of the WikiProject Porn stars, it clearly states: "Filmographies are to be limited to six films at most" (emphasis mine). As there is no indication that any of the additional films mentioned qualify for the criteria for "additional listings", I randomly pulled films out until I hit the magic number of six. If you wish to change which films are present on the list, or provide valid reasons for adding films over and above the 6 film mark, be my guest. Tabercil 13:05, 7 August 2006 (UTC)