Mongoloid race

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Typical Mongoloid skull with the characteristic flattened face and high cheek bones
Enlarge
Typical Mongoloid skull with the characteristic flattened face and high cheek bones [1]

The term Mongoloid race or Mongoloid sometimes referred to as "Sinoid", "Mongolid" or "Xanthrochroid"[2] or Asio-American[3] or Eastern Eurasian[4], is most used in discussions of human prehistory, historical definitions of race and in the forensic analysis of human remains. Out of the three main races in craniofacial anthropology, the Mongoloid race is the second most populous race with 33% of the world's population.[5]

The suffix "-oid" indicates a similarity, not necessarily exact, to something else. Mongoloid, therefore, does not necessarily equate to earlier terms such as "Mongolian" — whatever the parameters for their definitions may be — and much less does it equate to the Mongolian nationality.[6]

Racial classification, and even the existence of race, is controversial. The -oid racial terms are now often controversial in both technical and non-technical contexts and are likely to give offense no matter how they are used. [7]

Contents

Usage

"Mongoloid" loosely applies to physical traits and not to contemporary or historic definitions of racial or social groups. Some current terms for the latter are Asian, East Asian, Southeast Asian, and Oriental; however the range of Mongoloid does not correspond exactly to any one of these. In regards to "Asian", it can be said that North Asians, East Asians, and Southeast Asians are physically Mongoloid. Many Central Asians are Mongoloid, such as the Kazakhs, Kyrgyz and Uighurs, but many are a generic mix of Caucasoid and Mongoloid. South Asians are predominantly Caucasoid, with the exception of Tibeto-Burman speaking peoples living in the northeast, such as the Nagas. West Asians (Middle Easterners) are classified as Caucasoids, though some Turkish people have Mongoloid traits, proof of their Central Asian heritage .

Since people with Down syndrome have some superficially Mongoloid physical characteristics of epicanthal fold and brachycephalization, the term "Mongol" or "Mongoloid Idiocy"[8] was once also used as a synonym for retardation. It was also employed by some, primarily in John Langdon Down's Observations on the Ethnic Classification of Idiots (1866), as an alleged evolutionary degeneration when applied to Caucasoids. For these reasons, the usage of the term Mongoloid for racial purposes has acquired offensive connotations for some people. Due to this offensive use, the term Eastern Eurasian has been proposed as a euphemism for the term Mongoloid.[9]

Geographic range

The Mongoloid classification has long been debated as to whom it includes. As a form of classification by Carleton S. Coon (1904-1981), "Mongoloid" includes the indigenous peoples of North Asia, East Asia, Southeast Asia, and some parts of Central Asia and South Asia. Most people from South Asia are usually classified as Caucasoid, while most of those from Central Asia as intermediate.

By extension, Mongoloid may include Polynesians from the mid-Pacific Oceania, the indigenous peoples of the Americas, and those of Greenland. Some indigenous populations of Northern Europe (eg. the Sami of Finland) and some Eastern Europeans are said to have cranial morphology (brachycephalicy, high zygomas, etc.) but not pigmentation (blondism, eye color, etc) resembling Mongoloids.

Mongoloid peoples may be the most spread out among all human populations. According to Carleton S. Coon's definition, they have stretched almost completely around the earth's surface as either aboriginals (the first to arrive in a given region) or as conquering migrants. They can be found as far "east" as Greenland, and yet also as far to the "west" as Kalmykia, giving Asiatic peoples or their descendants a historical presence across the vast expanse of four continents.

Characteristic features

Physical characteristics typical of Mongoloids include oblique palpebral fissures that create almond-shaped eyes, also known as epicanthal folds. The presence of epicanthic folds is most prevalent in people of East Asian and Southeast Asian descent.

The overwhelming majority also exhibit the Mongolian spot, which is a natural smooth brown or blue-gray birthmark usually on the lower back and buttocks area of infants and is visible up to about age four. This feature, however, is not unique to Mongoloids, and may be found among European and African populations although at a much reduced frequency.

The vast majority of Mongoloids have straight black hair, although wavy hair is not that uncommon, especially in parts of North Asia. The vast majority of Mongoloids also possess dark brown eyes, but the occurrence of grey eyes and even blue eyes has been observed among a few Central Asian and Mongolians, though this could be from a Caucasoid continuum. Skin pigmentation varies significantly. The skin's undertone is usually yellowish, but the actual pigmentation may go from very pale, to pale and light brown, medium brown, to dark brown and extremely dark. Sometimes greater facial and body hair may sometimes also occur.

Cranial morphology is typically brachycephalic (round-headed) with high-set zygoma (cheekbones). Faces are relatively broad and flat, while noses are typically small with low nasal bridges and minimal nasal projection. They have a high forehead vault and rounded countours to their skull with few skulll sutures on their cranium.[10] Body hair is scarce and sweat glands are also fewer. Nevertheless, mesocephalic craniology (intermediate between round and oval), somewhat higher nasal bridges.

Note that among the New World Mongoloids, or more specifically the people who are not the indigenous populations of Arctic North America, the occurrence of epicanthal folds is almost absent; skin pigmentations may also go from pale to light, medium, and dark brown, but the undertone is reddish; and larger often "hooked" noses, with high nasal bridges and great nasal projection are most common.

The "prototypic" Mongoloid features seem to have originated among those who originate from drier, arid, or colder inland or northern regions. Whereas tropical and damper weather along the Pacific coast or in the proximity of the Equator seems to have contributed to significantly less body and facial hair. The same might also be argued for Africans.

Strict Usage in Forensics

Main article: Forensic classification of race

In forensic anthropology, however, remains are often classified into one of the three populations: Black, White, or Asian. In U.S. legal practice, these are respectively termed "Negroid," "Caucasoid," and "Mongoloid". Based on these parameters, populations genetically unrelated to Mongoloids, such as the Khoisan, are found to be "Mongoloid".[citation needed]

Mongoloid variation

Because there is much dispute on what constitutes a "Mongoloid", many physical anthropologists have classified different people as "Mongoloid" due to superficial physical similarities such as the presence of an epicanthal fold or brachycephalization. Although the description of physical characteristics provided by 19th century field researchers may be accurate, their theories on genetic links between peoples as distant as the Sami and the Tibetans are generally unaccepted by the scientific community today.

Original Mongoloid

The South African Mongoloids are claimed by M. Stewart to be the original Mongoloid race. South African Mongoloids have the characteristics typical of Mongoloids such as shovel-shaped incisors, epicanthic folds, skin color but more importantly craniology. They are thought to be the originators of the Mongoloid race. This hypothesis is supported by their genetic distance from other Mongoloids which M. Stewart claims shows their ancient split from other Old World Mongoloids. M. Stewart hypothesizes that these original Mongoloids mixed with the straight haired Negroid in India and Australia and the "Cro-Magnon type Neanderthal-Africoid mixture".[11] Others such as Paul Klevius believe the Mongoloid features of South Africans originated in Asia and migrated into to South Africa.[12]

Northern Mongoloid

The Northern Mongoloid peoples are from North Asia [13] also known as East Asia. They are larger, taller and lighter-skinned than other Mongoloids. They have somewhat hairier bodies than other Mongoloid type, and their facial features are quite sharp.

Farther to the south and east of interior Asia, the northern and interior the Japanese, Koreans, northern Han Chinese, and Manchus also continue to inherit these other prototypical physical features. Other Northern Mongoloids include many smaller groups in Central Asia and the Arctic regions such as the Buryats, Chukchis, Tuvans, Nivkhs, Evenki, Yakuts, Siberian Inuit, Tibetans, and Mongolians.

The indigenous Ainu people of Japan are also grouped into the northern Mongoloids although others view them as being descended from Caucasoids. Some of their characteristics are considered Caucasoid.[14] In the early 20th century anthropologists debated on what typological classification the Ainu belonged to. The typological models of racial classification in use at that time have since undergone significant revision, in the light of developments in fields such as genetics.

The Han Chinese are by far the most populous and heterogeneous Mongoloid "group". Indeed, the Han are often said to be the largest single group of any race, however, they are really not a truly coherent single ethnicity. The concept of a unified group of Han Chinese is more so a cultural anthropological concept rather than a biological anthropological one.

Southern Mongoloid

The peoples of the majority of continental Southeast Asia, specifically those who are located west of the Annamite Mountain range, including Malaysia, Indonesia, and the Philippines are Southern Mongoloids[15] They are considered Mongoloid according to the four-race theory [citations needed], however, they are genetically distinct from their neighbors to the north and may be considered a Southern Mongoloid race [citations needed].

The Southern Mongoloid is typically shorter-nosed, with quite hairless bodies, and tend to be slender. Starting with the southern Han Chinese of the southeastern coast, they are believed to be adapted to damper climates and allegedly mixed with Austronesian prototypes migrating to the Pacific Ocean.

In Southeast Asia, these Southern Mongoloids have assimilated, mixed in with, or replaced Australoids in some areas. Some Pacific Islanders or Polynesians may also be considered Mongoloids, although in this area of the world, Australoids and Mongoloids have hybridised considerably and the lines between the two "races" are blurred.

Although the Vietnamese, who are located and originate to the northeast of the Annamite Mountain Range, are geographically labelled as "Southeast Asians", their ethnic and cultural heritage ties them to their immediate northern neighbours, the Southern Chinese and other tribes within the proximity of South China.

The Ainu people are believed to be the product of an ancient Southern Monogoloid migration into the Japanese archipelago, occurring before the Jomon Period in Japan.[16]

Ethnologist and linguist Harrison Laphaie classifies Polynesians as racially Mongoloid.[17] N. Chebroksarov considers Polynesians to be a form of Southern Mongoloid.[18]

Central Asian Mongoloid

Recent genetic studies suggest that humans ancestral in part to both today's Mongoloids and Caucasoids migrated to Central Asia from South Asia or the Middle East 40-50 thousand years ago, much of modern Central Asians' ancestry is thought to stem from later migrations from the west (such as the Tocharian Caucasoids and Indo-Iranian Caucasoids) and from the east (such as various Turkic peoples and the Mongols); migration from South Asia had less of an impact in this later period. See also History of Central Asia.

Excluding the effects of 19th and 20th century Russian and Han Chinese colonization, Mongoloid elements are strongest among the northern traditionally nomadic peoples such as the Kyrgyz, Kazakhs, and Mongols. The farming populations further south like the Uzbeks and Uyghurs show both northern Mongoloid and Mediterranean Caucasoid traits. There is no sharp distinction in appearance between the Uzbeks who speak a Turkic language and their close neighbors the Tajiks who speak an Iranian language; traditionally, mixture and bilingualism were very common, until boundaries based on linguistic nationalism were drawn in the 20th century. In general, Caucasoid traits increase away from the steppes and in mountains such as the Pamirs. However, the Hazara are a southern outlier of part-Mongoloids in the Hindu Kush mountains of central Afghanistan.

New World Mongoloids

The Indigenous Peoples of the Americas are believed to have entered the American continent from Asia between 35 to 25 thousand years ago. See Models of migration to the New World. The earlier of these migrations are known as Amerindians, and they are distinct from the subsequent migrations who would become the indigenous populations of Arctic North America (the various Alaskan and indigenous Arctic Canadian groups such as the Inuit, Innu, and Aleuts).

The indigenous groups of Arctic North America — including the Haida people of British Columbia on the northwest coast — can often resemble Central Asians and even Northern Asians (such as Koreans or Japanese), making them much closer to the Northern Mongoloid type than even Southeast Asians.

The Amerindians, however, are often considered a separate population pool to, or at most a distant division of, Mongoloids. The Amerindians branched off of archaic or proto-Mongoloids from Siberia and other parts of Northeast Asia, including the Ainu or such groups related to them (See Kennewick man). From that point in time, when they crossed over to North America and dispersed into Central and South America, they evolved independently for tens of thousands of years, not coming into contact with any Old World populations until the arrival of Europeans just over 500 years ago. This large time gap of separate isolated evolution resulted in certain distinct genetic and physical characteristics not found in Old World Mongoloids or the indigenous groups of Arctic North America.

The indigenous groups of Arctic North America are always clustered with Old World Mongoloids due to their recent arrival and their shared evolution.

Boyce Rensberger claims that New World Mongoloids may be partially Caucasoid. He reports that the 9,300 year old remains of a man unearthed in Kennewick, Washington as having Caucasoid features. This has led anthropologist D. Gentry Steele to hypothesize that there were two separate waves of Caucasoid and Mongoloid migrations into the Americas. Many anthropologists consider these two physical types to have mixed in ancient history, resulting in the broad range of physical types of New World Mongoloids. Anthropologist Owsley considers a proto-Caucasoid physical type in Northeast Asia to have been the forebearer of the Caucasoid physical type in the Americas. Others speculate that the Caucasoid physical type may have arisen independently from the Mongoloid physical type in the Americas.[19]

South Asian Mongoloid

Paul Kekai also claims that Kerala is partially Mongoloid due to the migrations Turko-Mongoloids there.[20] The Andaman and Nicobar islands off of India's coast are also partially Mongoloid. The Nicobarese and Shompen are a Mongoloid people who live there.[21] Also, anthropologist Lobsang Gelek concluded that the South Asian Mongoloid was physically distinct from Northern and Southern Mongoloids. He theorizes that the South Asian Mongoloid broke away from the Northern Mongoloid in the Neolithic era. These South Asian Mongoloids are physically different from their Northern Mongoloid counterparts by their dimunitive stature.[22] Vikrant Kumar also agrees they are significantly physically different from other Mongoloid populations.[23]

Populations variously classified as Mongoloid

Thomas Huxley

Main article: Thomas Huxley

The 19th century anthropologist Thomas Huxley considered the Nordic countries and Russia to be Mongoloids. He classified the nations of Norway and Sweden to be a mix of his proposed "Mongoloid" and "Xanothrochoi" divisions, but Central Asia, parts of India, Finland, and Russia were completely Mongoloid. Greece and western Turkey were a supposed mix of his "Mongoloid" and "Melanochroi" divisions. [24]

Egon Freiherr von Eickstedt

The 19th century German physical anthropologist Egon Freiherr von Eickstedt considered the Central and Eastern European to be transitional Mongoloids called "Osteuropids". Eickstedt's "Osteuropid" division posessed Mongoloid physical characteristics such as brachycephalization but had the blondism of Nordics.

Bruno Beger

The SS Rassenkunde expert Bruno Beger, a student of German eugenicist Hans F.K. Günther and part of Ernst Schäfer's expedition to Tibet, concluded that the Tibetans had physical characteristics between Nordic Caucasoids and Mongoloids. He theorized that they represented a transitional Mongoloid which was more racially evolved than other Mongoloids.

Carleton S. Coon

Main article: Carleton S. Coon

The controversial 20th century physical anthropologist Carleton S. Coon hypothesized that the Sami in Northern Europe were either a mixture of Caucasoid and Mongoloid races or a "lesser evolved" form of Caucasoid which retained its "previous" Mongoloid characteristics, based on the discredited evolutionary ladder theory. Coon called this subrace the "Lappish".[25]

Footnotes

  1. ^ Skulls Unlimited. Human Asian Mongoloid Skull. 2006. August 25, 2006. <http://www.skullsunlimited.com/human-asian-mongoloid-skull.html>.
  2. ^ Navajo Timeline. Origin of the Frist Americans. 2000. September 9, 2006. <http://www.lapahie.com/Timeline_Right.cfm>.
  3. ^ Chebroksarov, N. Pakistani History. "Races and Racism". September 19, 2006. <http://www.geocities.com/pak_history/racism.html>.
  4. ^ Barkat, Amiram. Dienekes' Anthropology Blog. Archeologists claim Essenes never wrote Dead Sea Scrolls. 2004. August 28, 2006. <http://dienekes.blogspot.com/2004_07_01_dienekes_archive.html>.
  5. ^ Thompson, Bert. Apologetics Press. 2006. September 9, 2006. [1]
  6. ^ Bartleby. American Heritage Book of English Usage. Mongoloid. 1996. September 10, 2006. <http://www.bartleby.com/64/C006/046.html>.
  7. ^ American Heritage Book of English Usage. Houghton Mifflin Company. 1996. <http://www.bartleby.com/64/C006/046.html#MONGOLOID>.
  8. ^ Ward, Connor O. John Langson Down the man and the message. 2006. August 26, 2006. <http://www.down-syndrome.info/library/periodicals/dsrp/06/1/019/DSRP-06-1-019-EN-GB.htm>.
  9. ^ Barkat, Amiram. Dienekes' Anthropology Blog. Archeologists claim Essenes never wrote Dead Sea Scrolls. 2004. August 28, 2006. <http://dienekes.blogspot.com/2004_07_01_dienekes_archive.html>.
  10. ^ Trotter, Mildred. Women in Health and Science. Operations at Central Identification Laboratory. 2004. September 2, 2006. <http://beckerexhibits.wustl.edu/mowihsp/words/TrotterReport.htm>.
  11. ^ Stewart, M. The Global World is in a time of Backwardness! 2006. September 1, 2006.<http://www.stewartsynopsis.com/backwards.htm>.
  12. ^ Klevius, Peter. Did the "Aurignacian"*) revolution (starting some 40.000 ya) from Lake Baycal**) to Iberia, create the multi-racial single-species we now consider the "real, global humans"? September 2, 2006. <http://klevius.info/Humandiaspora.html?1085339285543>.
  13. ^ Ainu Museum. The Ainu People. <http://www.ainu-museum.or.jp/english/eng01.html>.
  14. ^ The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition. Ainu. 2001-05. <http://www.bartleby.com/65/ai/Ainu.html>.
  15. ^ Ainu Museum. The Ainu People. <http://www.ainu-museum.or.jp/english/eng01.html>.
  16. ^ Ainu Museum. The Ainu People. <http://www.ainu-museum.or.jp/english/eng01.html>.
  17. ^ Navajo Timeline. Origin of the Frist Americans. 2000. September 9, 2006. <http://www.lapahie.com/Timeline_Right.cfm>.
  18. ^ Chebroksarov, N. Pakistani History. "Races and Racism". September 19, 2006. <http://www.geocities.com/pak_history/racism.html>.
  19. ^ Rensberger, Boyce. Putting a New Face on Prehistory. 1997. September 2, 2006. <http://www.geocities.com/TheTropics/Lagoon/1345/caucasian.html>.
  20. ^ Kekai, Paul. Austric Influences in India. <http://www.geocities.com/Tokyo/Temple/9845/austric.htm>.
  21. ^ Central Institute of Indian Languages. Study of Indigenous Lamguage of Andaman and nicobar Islands 2005. September 2, 2006. <http://www.ciil.org/Main/andaman/topo.htm>.
  22. ^ Gelek, Lonbsang. China Tibetology. A Brief Description of the Historical Relations Between Ancient Tibetan Culture and the Chinese Culture. 2003. August 25, 2006. <http://www.tibet.cn/english/zt/TibetologyMagazine/..%5CTibetologyMagazine/..%5CTibetologyMagazine/200312004421151904.htm>.
  23. ^ Kumar, Vikrant. Bashu, Debashis. Reddy, Mohon. Genetic Homogeneity in Northeastern India: Reflection of Tribe Caste Continuum in Genetic Structure. 2004. September 9, 2006. <http://www.geocities.com/vetinarilord/india.pdf#search=%22genetic%20mongoloid%22>.
  24. ^ Huxley, Thomas. On the Geographical Distribution of the Chief Modifications of Mankind. 1870. August 14, 2006. <http://aleph0.clarku.edu/huxley/SM3/GeoDis.html>.
  25. ^ Coon, Carleton S. The Races of Europe. Racial Classification within the White Family. August 11, 2006. <http://www.snpa.nordish.net/chapter-VIII6.htm>.

External links