Talk:Mohenjo-daro
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Mohenjo-Daro and Dholavira
-
- There are many pictures on free websites and I request the readers of this talk to add the pictures and links. Some pictures and links are added on Dholavira.
- vkvora 18:10, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- There are many pictures on free websites and I request the readers of this talk to add the pictures and links. Some pictures and links are added on Dholavira.
[edit] Tags
It is being suggested and stressed that all articles about historical sites in South Asia which are not in the Republic of India should be tagged using {{WP SouthAsia}} instead of {{WP India}}. {{WP India}} contains references to present day India, including but not limited to the Flag of India, which represent India the country rather than the whole region. Using this tag for those sites which are not in India is deemed strongly offensive and an indirect territorial claim over the country of the site. Any article can have tags representing the country where the site is located along with {{WP SouthAsia}} to emphasize the importance of the site in the history of whole region including all countries. Szhaider 20:46, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
PS: The same suggestion is applied to the personalities with historical importance for the entire South Asia.
- so why there's there a pak flag there? Pak didn't exist back then. Your flag is strongly offensive. Take it off. Make it neutral. it's greener than ireland.--D-Boy 05:26, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Even it is not inda it is Sindh (indus valley)
Then it is Sindh Better to use Flag of sindh rather then Indian? why india? Read again ,there was sindh called as indus valley so better for u both to use sindh falg then india or pakistan flag u do not agree.khalidkhoso.
-
- You guys did not read my suggestion carefully. You tried to read it in a glance and rushed to respond. Here is the part you must be interested in:
- "Any article can have tags representing the country where the site is located along with {{WP SouthAsia}}"
- Szhaider 11:58, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- You guys did not read my suggestion carefully. You tried to read it in a glance and rushed to respond. Here is the part you must be interested in:
-
- PS: By the way I had a queer belief that Admins were supposed to be neutral in a dispute, rather than becoming a part of it and taking sides. May be they are supposed to take sides. Who knows? Szhaider 12:19, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Categories: WikiProject Indian history articles | Unassessed Indian history articles | Unknown-importance Indian history articles | Unassessed India articles | Unassessed India articles of unknown-importance | Unknown-importance India articles | WikiProject Pakistan history articles | Unassessed Pakistan history articles | Unknown-importance Pakistan history articles | Unassessed Pakistan articles | Unknown-importance Pakistan articles | WikiProject South Asia history articles