User talk:Moe Epsilon/Archive September 2006

COME BACK

Moe Epsilon come back! Batman2005 20:37, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

He's baaaaaack

Hey babe, good you're back. ;) Highway ^Daytrippers 21:42, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

monobook restored

per your request. NawlinWiki 21:54, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

thanks

Thanks for reverting the edit to my user page. Sharp eyes! Girolamo Savonarola 22:55, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

yay

Glad to see you back Moe! ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 01:09, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

You're back

It's always good to see. Good luck out there. RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 14:00, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

WP:NAM

Hi. There's some debate about the shortcut WP:NAM to the essay Wikipedia:No angry mastodons. Some people vote for keeping it, but the major essay authors themselves suggest removing it (see reasoning at here - shortly, it sounds too like a policy). What's your opinion? CP/M ^comm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 18:09, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

I never got the time to thank you

For opening up this. My connection got cut just right after my incedent with him, so I didn't have any time to try and contanct someone about it. Dunno what would have happened had you not taken the case. 69.145.123.171 ^Hello! Tuesday, September 12, 2006, 20:05 (UTC)

Sounds good to me. Methinks he's a prime candidate for an indefblock. 69.145.123.171 ^Hello! Tuesday, September 12, 2006, 20:14 (UTC)

Ah, so we think alike. I'm sure that they'll want to squash any chance of his return, though, by making sure he can't edit through that account. ;) 69.145.123.171 ^Hello! Tuesday, September 12, 2006, 20:20 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for unsubst'ing my indefblock templates. I appreciate it. --Yamla 22:21, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

User:Mgdriven

Why the change ([1]?--BSI 14:39, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Doug Basham

In reference to Basham's name... I have his senior yearbook in which it shows his name to be, in fact, Lyle Douglas Basham. I added the link I did to reinforce the fact of his full birthname. I'd stated all this on the discussion page, with no one commenting at the time. As per discussion at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions the yearbook should stand as reliable primary source. I don't want an edit war, but I do think that a biography should be accurate :-) -- Supersquid 20:56, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Good point, I posted the question to WP:BLP/N (more applicable than Admin noticeboard) in regards to sourcing from non-web based items. My point is that paper predates the WWW by several centuries, and still the majority of the written word has yet to make it to cyberspace, yet there are thousands of articles on Wikipedia that reference analog pages (lol) which are considered reputable sources. I can always scan the yearbook and post it to the talk page (if it is permissable under fair use) on the issue of verifiability, but to be honest that would be overkill IMHO (besides it'd take more time that I'm willing to expend lol). I just want to do right in regards to a home-town hero.

Supersquid 22:30, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Good to see you back!

Ok, a week late, but I just discovered you're back. Welcome back! Great to see you! --Durin 14:41, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Warning

A warning to avoid personal attacks in regard to Sceptre; your comment was highly incivil. Ral315 (talk) 02:14, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Welcome back

Long time no see. Good to have you back. -- bd (talk to me) (watch me) 06:56, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Whoa, you're back! That's great! —this is messedrocker (talk) 10:47, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Succession boxes

Who decided that they should just be gone? If it was just a decision by yourself, all of it should be reverted. You can't just decide on something big like that, without discussing it on the project page first. RobJ1981 20:05, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Konnan

lol well this format should still be uused as far as im concerned.... or all will have is list and succession boxes and we dont want that... plus it was part of the peer reviews of the konnan article and it is the only article listed in the good article standard --- Paulley 21:24, 22 September 2006

SummerSlam

I use Windows XP and Internet Explorer 6.0, and your edits just create a HUGE white space for me. I took a screen-cap to show you what I see [2] TJ Spyke 22:49, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Great, it now looks the same way it did when I edited it. [3] TJ Spyke 23:09, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

The Halo's RfA

Moe Epsilon... Thank you very much for the constructive criticism in your oppose comment in my request for adminship. Ultimately, no consensus was reached, and I failed to be promoted, but I am very grateful for your coments. I will strive to better myself in all areas, especially Mainspace. Thε Halo Θ

Because

You're helping us build something amazing. 69.145.123.171 _{Yes, I'm really an IP} Saturday, September 23, 2006, 00:42 (UTC)

Your restoration requests

All done. Your user page still looks blank, but the edit history is intact - so you can revert to any old version (be sure to refresh the history page if it still shows the old one though).--Konstable 01:34, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

All done =)--Konstable 01:44, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Whoa! You came back!

G'day Moe! When did you get back? I was in another debate over another User:OzWrestlemaniac sockpuppet and the internal link to your user page turned blue. I thought "somebody's been stuffin' around with Moe's page" but it was actually you. Good to see you back buddy. Normy132 03:16, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

I'm glad you've returned, Moe. Keep up the good work. And don't disappear again. That's really starting to get annoying. --TantalumTelluride 03:25, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Can you do me a favour?

Hey Moe. I need you to do me a massive favour. As you may (or may not) hae noticed, I go on Wikibreak tomorrow. I just had another user (User:Curse of Fenric) leave a message on my talk page concerning a possible sockpuppet (yes, another one) of User:OzWrestlemaniac. Nothing is concrete at the moment but I said I'd keep an eye on the situation. Seeing as you were involved in this issue at the beginning, do you think you could help him out with any issues he's having? I probably won't respond to this, I've got a truckload of revision to do. Thanks! Normy132 10:03, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Moe - if you check back to my talk page you'll see that the user concerned has (somewhat tersely I think but anyway) apologised. I think my message on her talk page hit a nerve and I put her in a spot that she couldn't get out of. It should be the end of that matter, but I do have the relevant page on my watch list if it happens again. Curse of Fenric 12:38, 1 October 2006 (UTC)