User talk:Modify

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Modify, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- Longhair | Talk 19:53, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Blockquotes

Using blockquotes is not only acceptable html code on Mortimer Adler, it is preferred because using a colon only indents the left margin, while blockquoting indents both margins. (see Wikipedia:How to edit a page#Examples) --Blainster 23:59, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the information and the head's up. I'm sure you had good reasons for using the blockquotes. My own preference is for a flush-right margin for quoted material, but indented margins are good as well. modify 17:25, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Template

Hi Modify, I actually like your template. I think a combination old/new template would work. Maybe as a compromise, it would be your fonts, text, and old width, colours. I'll try a new version tonight, and see what happens. Once again, thanks for trying to improve the template. -- Jeff3000 18:36, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Jeff3000, that's encouraging to hear. Let's see what you come up with. modify 15:41, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Hey Modify, Your blue version of the Baha'i template is now active. Thanks for the help. -- Jeff3000 13:20, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, Jeff3000, for acting on that. I was a way for a little while. modify 13:53, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] A4W Reactor

I reverted your broken links and if you'd like to discuss, let's bring it here. -- RevRagnarok Talk Contrib Reverts 12:51, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Please see my reply. As a friendly suggestion, you may wish to avoid using a vandalism tool to make such a revert, and do it by hand instead. This particular tool adds the user's name to a log and suggests that the original edit was vandalism, which, in this case, was clearly not the case. modify 13:15, 17 June 2006 (UTC)