Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Sandbox/Chess

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep unanimously. Xoloz 16:08, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Sandbox/Chess

After reading the whole I-am-sexy nonsense (see User_talk:I_am_sexy), I realised - we don't need a WikiChess either!

• DRV Notice, This debate has been restarted due to irregularities that has been raised in deletion review. I have no opinon on this matter. - Mailer Diablo 17:40, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Wikipedia is a community. Too many games, of course, would be distracting from our primary purpose of maintaining an encyclopedia; but a few classic games are great for building community spirit, taking short breaks between tedious edits, and introducing newcomers to some relatively advanced wiki-syntax. --TantalumTelluride 20:10, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep seeing as this page is already depreciated anyway Ydam 10:51, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per TantalumTelluride. +Hexagon1 ^(t) 06:08, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep --Terence Ong 09:32, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.