Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/TheM62Manchester

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy keep (see this page.) — FireFox ^(talk) _{20:30, 22 September 2006}

[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/TheM62Manchester

Since WP:DENY is being used to delete vandal userpages, should it also be used to delete RFA's of vandals??

Note: This vandal has impersonated me; as such I feel this page should be deleted for that reason as well as WP:DENY. --LiverpoolCommander 10:44, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. I understand the reasoning above, but, as the RfA was in a sense an "official" part of wikipedia, I think it should stay. I don't think we've yet gotten to the point of being able to change events after the fact here. Badbilltucker 13:03, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
• Question, sorry, but I don't quite understand why you want this page deleted, please explain. Thanks.--Andeh 16:07, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
• Strong, strong keep. – Do you intend on MfD'ing all requests for adminship of indefinitely blocked users? I think you'll find there are quite a few. I would perhaps say delete if and only if the RfA was created by a known Wikipedia vandal at the time, and in this case it wasn't. I also feel the reason 'this vandal has impersonated me' is not a valid reason for deletion. Should definitely be kept for record purposes if for no other reason. And also a question to LiverpoolCommander – how has he impersonated you? Your account was created some two weeks after he was blocked indefinitely. — FireFox ^(talk) _{16:32, 22 September 2006}
• Keep exactly per FireFox. This is a historical record of a sort. The user was found to be a vandal quite a bit after his RFA failed. Additionally, LiverpoolCommander's account was created quite a bit after TheM62Manchester was indef-blocked, so I don't see how he could possibly have been impersonated by this particular vandal. Srose (talk) 17:22, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above. I think LiverpoolCommander is referring to the socks claimed by TheM62Manchester, as his user page states: "My last usernames were Chelston (editing the Ford Verona article... I like Ford cars!) and Blackrunner but I locked myself out! Plus a few good edits under anon IPs too in 2005... so I'm not that new!" Yomangani^talk 18:54, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.