Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks/Stu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mirrors and Forks : (Numbers) ABC - DEF - GHI - JKL - MNO - PQR - STU - VWXYZ - Archive

[edit] S

[edit] SageReport.com

SageReport.com
URL	http://sagereport.com/
Sample	http://sagereport.com/Cali-to-Car/cat.php
Rating	High
Details	Previously non-compliant. Now a notice in footer reads "The information on this page was used from wikipedia.org in accordance with the GNU Free Documentation Licence" with links to Wikipedia and the GFDL.
Contact info	WHOIS information Private registration through Domains by Proxy, Inc. Email: SAGEREPORT.COM@domainsbyproxy.com Phone: (480) 624-2599 Fax: (480) 624-2599
Actions	Sent first GFDL notice via email on June 11, 2006. Sent follow-up GFDL notice via email on June 19, 2006. Sent final GFDL notice on July 3, 2006. Response received July 4, 2006, and website updated accordingly.

[edit] savage-comedy.com

savage-comedy.com
URL	http://www.savage-comedy.com/
Sample	http://www.savage-comedy.com/_Antarctica
Rating	Medium
Details	Uses a boilerplate footer "All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License (see Copyrights for details). It uses material from the http://en.wikipedia.org", but no link back to article.
Contact info	{{{contact}}}
Actions	{{{action}}}

[edit] San Luis Obispo Bill of Rights Defense Committee

Site: San Luis Obispo Bill of Rights Defense Committee
Only uses opening paragraph from USA PATRIOT Act.
Mentions Wikipedia, and provides link to article.
No GFDL mention.
Almost certainly fair use.

[edit] SCA wiki

Site: SCA wiki
Link & mention of GFDL
No link to/credit given to wikipedia article; only a generic notice: "some of the initial information in Cunnan was taken from the Wikipedia but has been, or will be rewritten to make it relevant to people interested in medieval re-enactment"
Example: [1]
- As this is another wiki it is hard to control what other users put in. There is a general directive on the Village Pump to credit all wikipedia articles appropriately, and there has been a recent effort by several users to track down and tag such pages when they have become apparent. Even considering that the citation here was not appropriately credited, I am not entirely sure why this was listed as a low compliance site when there were both links to wikipedia and GFDL. Conrad Leviston 13:13, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Sci Peeps

Site: Sci Peeps (a copy of Fermentation)
Low Compliance

Links to wikipedia.org, that is it, no license notice, link to original, nothing. Seems to be down currently.

Claims own copyright. Superm401 | Talk 16:44, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Science 24

See Wikipedia:Mirrors_and_forks/Abc#Base_Science_24

[edit] School Explorer

Site: http://www.school-explorer.com
Example: [2] of Albania
Ends with 'Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albania"' with link to original article
No mention of GFDL
"Disclaimer" states "distributed by Web Exploring Consultancy (W.E.C.) The Netherlands"
As of 00:11, 14 December 2005 (UTC) --Henrygb

[edit] ScienceDaily

ScienceDaily
URL	http://www.sciencedaily.com/encyclopedia/
Sample	http://www.sciencedaily.com/encyclopedia/archaeology
Rating	High
Details	Says "This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Archaeology"" with offsite link to the GFDL and link to the original article. However, it also says "Copyright © 1995-2006 ScienceDaily LLC — All rights reserved". Normally, I would ignore this as a meaningless error; however, the terms of use say "Permission is NOT granted for reproduction of any of the content under [...] Encyclopedia" and "Such third-party content [referring to the encyclopedia] is subject to their own separate copyright restrictions and may not be reproduced or transmitted in whole or in part without the express written permission of the respective copyright holder(s)." which is clearly contrary to the GFDL.
Contact info	editor@sciencedaily.com, xk78h8fb5k5@networksolutionsprivateregistration.com (private WHOIS), support@ultradns.com
Actions	Sent email asking for misleading copyright statements to be removed. Superm401 - Talk 01:47, 17 February 2006 (UTC) Received reply stating "I'll take a look at both our own copyright links and our terms of use page, and make any needed adjustments." Superm401 - Talk 06:20, 19 February 2006 (UTC) See their website now for a great GFDL compliance! Auroranorth 13:27, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] SciFiPedia

SciFiPedia
URL	http://scifipedia.scifi.com/index.php/Main_Page
Sample	http://scifipedia.scifi.com/index.php/The_Prisoner
Rating	Low/None
Details	Terms of Use are very restrictive and incompatible with GFDL. They don't actively copy our content, but well-meaning users are copying stuff there without understanding that it has to remain GFDL.
Contact info	John R. Douglas - editor.scifipedia@scifi.com
Actions

[edit] Scripophily.net

Site: http://www.scripophily.net
Example: http://www.scripophily.net/lefrhme19.html
No mention of Wikipedia - uses material from H.L. Mencken article.

Still not compliant. Lotsofissues 06:17, 11 May 2005 (UTC)

Any progress on this one? 84.235.135.246 10:02, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] SearchEnterpriseLinux.com

Site: SearchEnterpriseLinux.com
Contains a small section of the article about vendor lock-in
Mentions Wikipedia, but has no link
No GFDL Link
- Seems fair use. Andre Engels 01:50, 17 Jan 2004 (UTC)

[edit] SearchSpaniel.com

Site: SearchSpaniel.com

More research requested.

[edit] Secretmaker

Site: http://www.secretmaker.com/technopedia/default.html
Example article: MP3 MP3
Interestingly, most articles are slightly paraphrased from their Wikipedia versions - may be a misguided attempt to avoid copyright problems.
no mention of Wikipedia
no mention of GFDL
no authors
no history or link back to original article
Submitted by Rhobite 08:27, Feb 14, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Shoepedia

Site: http://www.jordantheking.com/shoepedia/index.php
Example article: adidas adidas
This is another wiki. Most or all of the shoe brand articles incorporate large sections of the relevant Wikipedia article.
no mention of Wikipedia
no mention of GFDL
no history or link back to original article
The maintainer of the host domain (jordantheking.com) shows up as the sole contributor in the edit history for most/all of the articles. His Wikipedia user name is Jordantheking. I contacted him about this issue on his Wikipedia talk page as we are in the middle of a dialogue about something else at the time of my discovery of the violation.
Submitted by WAvegetarian ^(talk) (email) ^(contribs) 21:38, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Shortopedia

Site: http://www.shortopedia.com
Example article: Java programming language
Index of wikipedia articles by topics and with short description
Link to wikipedia on each page
GFDL mentioned and link to it on each page
link back to the original wikipedia article
Submitted by --217.23.199.99 18:17, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] singaporemoms.com

Site:www.singaporemoms.com
- Example:[3] from Homeopathy
- seems to be a fairly complete compy inlcludeing pics
- mentions wikipedia and GFDL in it's copyright policy after a click through.
- no link back to specific articles. No mention of authors but has link on "how to see transparent copy" with link to www.wikipedia.org and to local copy of GFDL plus link to local description of how to find original article. --Henrygb 01:59, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
- no action taken as yet.Geni 23:35, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sinoz

Site: Sinoz
- Example: [4] from Zone plate.
- Looks like it mirrors entire Wikipedia
- Contains link to GFDL and mention of Wikipedia, but no link to source Wikipedia article. Have sent a letter about this. --Laura Scudder | Talk 23:23, 16 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sir Tom Jones Online

Site: http://www.freewebs.com/jvprn/index.htm
Example: http://www.freewebs.com/jvprn/discography.htm
Wikipedia content: [5] Tom Jones (Singer)
no mention or link back to Wikipedia
no mention of GFDL
contact: tomrocks65@optonline.net
no action taken as yet. 22:20, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Skwik

Site: www.skwik.com/wiki/
- Example: [6] taken from System of a Down
- The site is content-wise basically a pretty poor rip-off of the band-entries from en.wikipedia.org. Most band descriptions originate from here, sometimes 1:1, sometimes just the beginning sentence. Images are not copied or linked from wikipedia.
- There is no link either to the GFDL or the original Wikipedia article present, no mentioning of Wikipedia at all, including the disclaimers.
- I have send an email to info@skwik.com and informed the site's webmaster of this violation of Wikipedia's license. --Johnnyw July 9, 2005 16:03 (UTC)
- I received a positive answer: "Thank you very much for your comments and recommendations. We really appreciate them. We'll edit the site to comply with GFDL requirements and we'll do our best to give credits to Wikipedia. We also do our best to contribute content to Wikipedia." I'll try to keep an eye on this issue.--Johnnyw 13:39, July 10, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] skinnymouse.com

Site: www.skinnymouse.com/knowledge
Example: http://www.skinnymouse.com/knowledge/knowledgewiki.php?l=1&topic=Sony+HiFD
More research requested
- Looks reasonable to me (except for the fact there is no actual wikipedia content either at the Sony HiFD link above or at [7])
- GFDL statement and link to GFDL at gnu.org
- Link to original article and to XML export version, (thus mentioning Wikipedia)
- Even link to Wikipedia disclaimer
- As of 23:11, 3 December 2005 (UTC) --Henrygb

[edit] Slimer.org

Site: http://www.slimer.org/
Example page: http://www.slimer.org/d/a/al/albania.html
no mention of Wikipedia
no link to original page
every page ends with "This information is distributed under the terms of GNU Free Documentation License" and link to FDL at http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html

[edit] SmartPedia

Site: SmartPedia

(Upgraded from low compliance)

Apparently only Wikipedia content
No mention of any copyright other than:

at the bottom of the pages.

No mention of Wikipedia
No mention of GNU/FDL
No link to original article

First standard letter sent by Kwekubo 20:40, 29 May 2004 (UTC)

As of May 31, Smartpedia now says in small type at bottom:

"This document is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), which means that you can copy and modify it as long as the entire work (including additions) remains under this license.

GFDL | SOURCE"

GFDL links to the gnu.org text, and SOURCE links to the Wikipedia article, but there is no actual text credit given to Wikipedia.

On the main page: "Smartpedia is run by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation." Someone going to write them? This is not only a cheek, it could also get us into legal trouble. -- stw (Talk) 20:48, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Status changed to medium compliance. Kwekubo 15:33, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Their version of my user page modifies the template I use at the top of my page ({{userpage}}) that links to the original contained here so that it replaces "Wikipedia" to "Smartpedia" and breaks the link itself. - Lucky13pjn 20:00, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
- In fact, they replace "wikipedia" by "smartpedia" almost everywhere. Their version of wiki is at http://www.smartpedia.com/wiki-sb.html, and they claim that "the English-language Smartpedia is, by far, the world's largest wiki; the German-language Smartpedia is the second-largest, while the other Smartpedias fill many of the remaining slots". -- Aleph4 17:44, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Update as of September 30, 2005: They still link to the source article and the GFDL as described above, but they also still havent changed the whole "Wikipedia" → "Smartpedia" thing. - Lucky13pjn 15:18, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Snazon.com

Site: Snazon.com
Example: http://www.snazon.com/encyclopedia/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion (from ca Nov 17 2003)
Contains "From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia" text
Mentions Wikipedia, but link is local (to copy of Wikipedia:About), not to us
Link to GNU FDL does not work -404 error.
No link to article.

[edit] Snowpedia

Site: snowvision.org.nz/snowpedia
link to current version of article & Wikipedia main page
link to the GFDL on www.gnu.org

[edit] source-of-knowledge.com

Site: http://www.source-of-knowledge.com/
- live mirror; wikitech-l list has been informed
  - blocked by admin LarsSanders 18:28, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
No mention of GFDL or any kind of copyright, e.g:
- http://www.source-of-knowledge.com/default.asp?t=Wikipedia
has Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia at the bottom of each page, possibly because that is in the orignal.

LarsSanders 09:19, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

no contact details; the server IP reveals this site: http://67.168.102.196/ , see http://67.168.102.196/contact_us.asp for contact form and http://67.168.102.196/Terms_Conditions.asp for some laughable terms .

LarsSanders 09:25, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Snyke

Site: http://encyclopedie-en.snyke.com/ with 7 languages (change en)
Example: [8] of Albania
Ends article with "License : GFDL - Source: Wikipedia - Article" and links to GNU copy of GFDL, Wikipedia and original article. --Henrygb 18:30, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] spellcorrect.info

spellcorrect.info
URL	http://www.spellcorrect.info
Sample	http://www.spellcorrect.info/slaves.htm
Rating	None
Details	No mention of Wikipedia, GFDL, or any other copyright info on any page
Contact info	Registrant Email:SPELLCORRECT.INFO@domainsbyproxy.com Name Server:NS1.PHPWEBHOSTING.COM Name Server2:NS2.PHPWEBHOSTING.COM
Actions	None - Roarjo 05:46, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] stalkerpedia.org

stalkerpedia.org
URL	http://stalkerpedia.org/ http://stalkerpedia.org/
Sample	http://stalkerpedia.org/ http://stalkerpedia.org/
Rating	"Low/None"
Details	This site currently presents itself as a new, unedited Wikimedia Foundation wiki
Contact info	The domain registrant name and address (Thomas Archer, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, CA) are bogus. The address is a USGS office in Menlo Park. The phone number is clearly bogus: Registrant Phone:+1.8005551212. The registrant email is valid and is believed to be actually in use by Jeffrey_Vernon_Merkey, blocked user User:Gadugi, blocked user User:Waya_sahoni, sockpuppet User:67.186.225.152, and sockpuppet User:67.137.28.188 -- Registrant Email:tjarcher@comcast.net. This email address has been used by User:Waya_sahoni. The web site itself is refered to at Merkey/Gadugi/Waya sahoni's new wiki, wikigadugi.org. Also see: [libelpedia.org]
Actions	I feel that dealing with this potentially libelous web site is probably best left to Wikimedia foundation legal counsel. -- talks_to_birds 09:47, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Star Trek: USS Scorpion

Site: Star Trek: USS Scorpion
The page known allies combines material from various Wikipedia pages, possibly with other text included as well.
No mention of Wikipedia
No mention of the GNU/FDL

[edit] Start learning now

Site: http://www.startlearningnow.com/
Although they mention Wikipedia and the GNU/FDL on [this page] They don't make it obvious from article pages that the content is under the FDL.
Example, Bloomington, Indiana has no mention of Wikipedia, although its obvious that is where the content came from.
- Bloomington example (and others) now mentions Wikipedia, with links to Wikipedia XML and original page plus to GFDL at gnu.org. Page ends with "©2003-2005 All rights reserved, Start Learning Now."--Henrygb 02:14, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] StudyCrime.com

Site: StudyCrime.com
Sample article: Amphetamine, US Copyright Law
no mention of Wikipedia
no mention of GFDL

[edit] squaldrina.com

squaldrina.com
URL	http://www.squaldrina.com/
Sample	http://www.squaldrina.com/links/medicine/burnet.htm All their other biographies are lifted from Wikipedia
Rating	None
Details	Compliance violation
Contact info	No contact info available
Actions	None so far

[edit] Subnetworking.com

Site: subnetworking.com
Contains many articles that appear to be verbatim copies of articles, minus images and some tables.
No mention of Wikipedia.
No mention of GFDL
The site says under every page: MyAdvertisers.Com - Copyright © 2005 - All Rights Reserved

[edit] Susan's Place Transgender Wiki

Site: wiki.susans.org
Sample article: http://wiki.susans.org/index.php/Feminism
Contains text from various articles, mostly modified.
Most (or all?) pages with Wikipedia information say *Some information provided in whole or in part by http://en.wikipedia.org/
Content licensed under GFDL 1.2
Software: MediaWiki

[edit] T

[edit] t-st.de

Site: wikipedia.t-st.de
Copy of the German Wikipedia
Use the Wiki-text as their source, as can be seen when their wiki-to-HTML translation does not work (e.g. in tables)
Links to local copy of the GNU/FDL article, which links to GNU/FDL at gnu.org
Keeps "aus Wikipedia, der freien Enzyklopädie"
Links to article & German main page

[edit] TaxGloss

Site: http://www.taxgloss.com/
Example:[9] from Albania
Article ends with "Provided by Wikipedia.org", with link to Wikipedia, and "All Rights Reserved TAXGLOSS.COM"
No mention of GFDL
No link to original article
As of 23:22, 10 December 2005 (UTC) --Henrygb

[edit] Teach-ICT.com

Teach-ICT.com
URL	http://www.teach-ict.com/wiki
Sample	http://www.teach-ict.com/wiki/index.php?title=Computer
Rating	High
Details	Main Page states that all text entries on the wiki section are licensed under the GFDL, and provides an on-site link to the full licence text. Articles copied from Wikipedia contain a notice providing credit and a link back.
Contact info	admin@teach-ict.com, User talk:GeeJo (contributor)
Actions	None

[edit] Teachersparadise.com

Site: www.TeachersParadise.com
Example: http://www.teachersparadise.com/ency/en/wikipedia/e/ed/edmund_barton.html
Mentions GFDL
No mention of Wikipedia
Their "edit this page" button links back to Wikipedia's edit page form.
Listed here - August 10, 2004. →Raul654 21:06, Aug 10, 2004 (UTC)

[edit] TelecomPie.com

TelecomPie.com
URL	http://www.telecompie.com
Sample	http://www.telecompie.com/HBO-Network-Shows/Fraggle_Rock.php
Rating	low/none
Details	claims own copyright, mentions neither Wikipedia nor GFDL
Contact info	Registered in proxy. abuse@godaddy.com (ISP)
Actions	none

[edit] TheBestLinks.com

Site: www.TheBestLinks.com

Description of the site: uses modified MediaWiki software to serve up an unmodified current-version English Wikipedia article database. The visual appearance is slightly different and a bar near the top lists some of the first few links in the article. They have added some special pages for popular pages, new pages, and a "quick index", and have added them to the sidebar. They have also added the ability to add links and discussion to the bottom of articles (blog-style).

This mirror I would say is noncompliant. The GFDL is linked, but there is no indication whatsoever that it's Wikipedia material, much less a link to Wikipedia or the article. The authors therefore receive no credit. The creating company's contact is info@innovateit.com, but I have not contacted them. Deco 19:27, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)

They mirror everything! Down to the User space! Hell, they have a mirror of this discussion. [10] [11] -- AllyUnion (talk) 07:43, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)

They are certainly spammer fighting for some pageranks more. They put advertisement in the front of the text. But they do state (in tiny letter) that it is a Gnu document and then back link to wikimedia (not wikipedia)--Alexandre Van de Sande 13:43, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)

And the last update was september 2004 :( — Ilyan e p (Talk) 18:30, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Scratch that, but it definately hasn't been updated recently (my userpage on their site still features my long deleted picture) — Ilyan e p (Talk) 18:31, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] TheCatalyst.org

TheCatalyst
URL	http://www.thecatalyst.org/
Sample	http://www.thecatalyst.org/resource/2006/04/21/John-Dewey/
Rating	low/none
Details	Mirrors a selection of articles on Chemistry and Educational topics. Site claims copyright, mentions neither Wikipedia nor GFDL except that they reproduce our main page as one of their articles
Contact info	m_geyer@thecatalyst.org
Actions	none

[edit] TheComDaily.com

thecomdaily.com
URL	http://www.thecomdaily.com/
Sample	http://www.thecomdaily.com/itm.html (compare Information technology management), http://www.thecomdaily.com/Ann---Az/Astrology.php (compare Astrology)
Rating	low/none
Details	Site claims copyright, mentions neither Wikipedia nor GFDL
Contact info
Actions	none

[edit] TheFreeDictionary.com

TheFreeDictionary
URL	http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/
Sample	http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Albania
Rating	High
Details	There is a clear notice with a link to the original article and the GFDL, although the GFDL link goes to an off-site copy.
Contact info	http://app.thefreedictionary.com/feedback.aspx (contact form)
Actions	Standard letter sent. --Kwekubo 00:07, 11 December 2005 (UTC). Sent another violation letter. Superm401 - Talk 07:28, 22 January 2006 (UTC) Received reply noting that site was updated. I replied asking that he provide an on-site GFDL link, but otherwise the site is fine. Superm401 - Talk 08:17, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] thefreeencyclopedia.com

Site: www.thefreeencyclopedia.com
Example: http://www.thefreeencyclopedia.com/definition/word.aspx?w=Bro%27Town from Bro'Town
Link to original article in Wikipedia
attributes the article to Wikipedia
Mentions GFDL, provides link, but also says "Copyright © 2005 TheFreeEncyclopedia.com"
The link, attribution and GFDL license are not clearly visible
- i.e. in a very light grey small font, and uses graphics (the GDFL text is rendered as an image, making it invisible to text-only browsers and search engines.) and nofollow links

[edit] the-free-web-encyclopedia

the-free-web-encyclopedia
URL	http://www.the-free-web-encyclopedia.com/default.asp
Sample	http://www.the-free-web-encyclopedia.com/default.asp?t=England
Rating	Low
Details	No mention of GFDL. Mentions that the page was retrieved from Wikipedia as a link, but not a source.
Contact info	http://app.thefreedictionary.com/feedback.aspx (contact form)
Actions	Standard letter sent. -- WB 07:24, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Theopedia

Theopedia
URL	http://www.theopedia.com/
Sample	http://www.theopedia.com/Thirty-nine_Articles
Rating	Medium
Details	Redistributing under GFDL. Does not seem to link to transparent copy or authorship. The example is a fork of Thirty-Nine Articles
Contact info	http://www.theopedia.com/Special%3AListusers&group=sysop&username=
Actions	none yet

[edit] thepedia.com

[edit] The Pedia

Site: thepedia.com
Mirrors all content into it's own site, with the addition of computer-generated "summaries" at the tops of articles.
Seems relatively new - search box isn't even a search box, just a place-holder image.
~~NOT compliant: No mention of GFDL, no mention of Wikipedia (except on the text of the mirrored main page) and says "Copyright (c) 2005 ThePedia.com, All rights Reserved~~
- Owner contacted and site is now compliant. — Asbestos | Talk 15:37, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
Contact details from WhoIs: Registrant/Administrator: Roger Lichfield, admin@dmbc.com
Listed here July 13, 2005, — Asbestos | Talk 10:30, 13 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] the-real-story.com

Site: the-real-story.com
Duplicates parts or all of a half-dozen movie-related articles
Includes commercial Google links
No mention of Wikipedia or GFDL
Each page says "All content is Copyright © of The Real Story 2005"
Listed here November 20, 2005 --Arteitle 08:52, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Therfcc

Site: Therfcc.org
Example: [12]
Large amounts of Wikipedia content
Acknowledges GNU/FDL
Mentions Wikipedia, but no link to main page or individual articles.

[edit] Thinkdogs.com

See Wikipedia:Mirrors_and_forks/Vwxyz#zipox

[edit] tickerdvd.com

Site www.tickerdvd.com
Example: http://www.tickerdvd.com/articles/Sony_HiFD

More research requested

[edit] Tiosam.com

Site: http://www.tiosam.com/enciclopedia/enciclopedia.php
Sample article: http://www.tiosam.com/enciclopedia/enciclopedia.php?title=L%C3%ADngua_portuguesa
Info
- No edit link
- Mentions GFDL
- Aks people that use the content to link back to their site.
- Link (in english, the content is all in portuguese) to www.wikipedia.org
  
  Articles are cached copies extracted from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
- does't have the article history
- Has the users pages (access by address bar, like: http://www.tiosam.com/enciclopedia/enciclopedia.php?title=Usu%E1rio:Get_It)
Software: Don't know the software they are using, but if it is MediaWiki, they don't have the banner.
Listed here: 17:14, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC), Get It

[edit] ToCatch.info

Site: ToCatch.info
Example: http://www.tocatch.info/en/Ibn_Al-Zubayr.htm
Link to GNU FDL (local copy). JesseW 21:26, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
DOES NOT link to Wikipedia article. (It does, but it does it with Javascript, which hides it from search engines. Not acceptable. JesseW 21:26, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
DOES NOT mention Wikipedia. (Again, does so only in javascript.) JesseW 21:26, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
STEALS image bandwidth. (See source for http://www.tocatch.info/en/Ibn_Al-Zubayr.htm, redirect image)

Putting them in LOW. We need to send them a complaint letter. Bandwidth stealing is not acceptable. JesseW 21:26, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] TopArticle.com

Site: TopArticle.com
Link to GNU FDL.
Link to Wikipedia homepage via "Help build the worlds largest free encyclopedia"
No link to original article.
Says the content is from Wikipedia.

[edit] totalbike.com/wiki

Site: totalbike.com/wiki
No GNU FDL
Not mentioning wikipedia at all

Does not appear to still exist. -- Arwel (talk) 23:31, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] travel-destinations-01.com

[edit] Travel Destinations

Site: travel-destinations-01.com
Example: [13] from Beijing
Link to GNU FDL.
No link to Wikipedia homepage, but mention as a source.
No link to original article.
Says the content is from Wikipedia.

[edit] travel.mysic.org

Site: travel.mysic.org
Example: http://travel.mysic.org/Process_theology