Talk:Minnesota State Capitol

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, which aims to improve all articles related to Minnesota.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. [FAQ]
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating within Minnesota articles.
This article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

	This article is within the scope of the National Register of Historic Places WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of listings on the U.S. National Register of Historic Places. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.

This article is part of WikiProject U.S. state capitols, a WikiProject which aims to expand coverage of the various capitols and state houses of U.S. states on Wikipedia. Please feel free to join us.

[edit] Title

Every article listed in the U.S. state capitols category is named "_____ State Capitol" or "_____ State House". Every link to this article is pointing to "Minnesota State Capitol". Most importantly, people call it the Minnesota State Capitol, even if it's a bit redundant. Wikipedia policy is to use the common name. Based on all that, I think the article should stay where it is now. Jonathunder 04:50, 2005 Apr 23 (UTC)

If it is Wikipedia policy to use the name that it is called, why is the Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis under Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis? EdwinHJ | Talk 00:17, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

"Use common name" is the general rule, but some categories have their own, more specific, conventions. Jonathunder 05:28, 2005 Apr 24 (UTC)

[edit] Content

It is stated "Equally, he managed to avoid any reference to a palace block that would have been offensive to Minnesotans." While that's interesting, it leaves the reader wondering WHY that would be offensive to Minnesotans.