User talk:Mikecraig
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mikecraig. |
 |
| This is the User talk page for Mikecraig |
|
|
Contents |
[edit] Rudd photo
I have taken and donated to Wikipedia an on-the-spot, public-domain photo of a historic event, and you delete it! Who do you think you are? Adam 03:32, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- Hey clown shoes...why not look at any other politician wiki page and find that pics like this go below the article and to be placed in the section of the article relevant to the photo in question...advice (1..get a clue about editing Wikipedia...2...listen to what advice people give) - there endeth the lesson! --Mikecraig 03:35, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Get a hobby
What is wrong with you mate? A petition is as relevant as any other rubbish thats on here. Dont you think if you where a fan of something you would want to know of any current petitions?
Get a hobby, and stop sitting at your desk quoting the rule book at people. It's particularly absurd coming from a person like you, with your dodgy history on this site. Youve got more complaints and warnings than anyone ive seen.
Build a bridge and get over it!
JackFoxInc 04:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Nice work on the grammar and spelling. Also if you were being helpful and contribute to Wikipedia, then you would not be link spamming to petition sites. --Mikecraig 05:45, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Greg Fleet
What do you have against including Greg Fleet's well publicised heroin addiction? There are numerous media interviews available online, as well as the DVD release of the ABCs "Smallest Room in the House" show, in which Fleet himself discusses his heroin addiction, and the problems arising from it.
It is a large part of his life, not least of all because of his very public discussion of it.
I have now included three links to these sources, and could provide many more if you need to be convinced. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.190.196.4 (talk) 09:14, 5 December 2006 (UTC).
- As long as its cited then all is fine --Mikecraig 21:10, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Nothing else in the article was cited, yet you didn't delete any of that. Oh well, nice to beat you at your own officious game. Guess that's what comes from being in "Emergency Services & Law Enforcement" - what a joke.
- Good to see that you dont have the balls to sign your own posts...oh by adding extra sections to the article in question to make it look better and have put the personal life stuff in it's own section...wow! I contributed and you cry like a loser... yawn! --Mikecraig 04:33, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Warnings and Threats
Stop sending me warnings and making threats about blocking me from editing. I haven't edited anything in the past two days and if you say you have proof I did, then you are wrong!!! You people need to get a fricking life! Remember, this isn't a perfect world, so don't get your undies in a bundle!
User: Butterflykisses723
- Why did you keep making all those edits on Lukas Rossi which was not following WP policy eh? Also by blanking your talk page is a no-no also...you have been warned by an admin now so the ball is your court! --Mikecraig 04:24, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Overraction?
Studying the above case, it seems there may be a case of overreaction that escalated the level of conflict. Please don't use the bv tag unless the is very obvious blatant vandalism. In this case it would seem more like a difficult newcomer that was not aware of all wikirules, and may have provoked by the reactions for the wikicommunity. Don't forget wikilove ;) -- Egil 06:31, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- THEY were removing tags, blanking pages..etc - anyway they have been warned by an admin so I really dont care what this person does anymore as they have one more chance before getting the flick. --Mikecraig 21:31, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Nandos
Hi Mike, "See also" sections are good for similar Wikipedia articles, but the restaurant in question doesn't appear to have one. "External links" are good for web pages that provide a substantial resource beyond the WP page, directly concerning the subject of the article, i.e. an article about a company can link to its own company website, but not to those of competitors / similar enterprises operated by others. The thing to do is ensure your subject meets the WP:CORP criteria and create an article about it. Deizio talk 23:09, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Ah okay..thanks for letting me know that --Mikecraig 23:11, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
