User talk:Michael/Trapeze

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is not going to work, Michael. Why are you wasting your time? Don't you notice that all your edits are reverted? --Eloquence 20:00 1 Jun 2003 (UTC)

Yeah well, I don't want them to be reverted again! --Michael/Trapeze

user talk:Michael/ban

As I've explained before, if you want to contribute to Wikipedia, you have to

• play nice - don't insult people
• talk to Jimbo first (email him at jwales at bomis dot com)
• check your facts - much of your information is provably inaccurate.

Otherwise your edits will continue to be reverted, your time will be wasted.

If you like wikis a lot, you can also set up your own wiki at http://www.seedwiki.com - no need to use Wikipedia, and nobody would censor you there. --Eloquence 20:12 1 Jun 2003 (UTC)

Okay I will follow these rules you're saying to me. -- Michael

I will be looking forward to a message from Jimbo. You continue to be banned until Jimbo lifts the ban. But notice that people will be nice to you if you are nice to them (although your insults to Zoe will be harder to forget). --Eloquence 20:18 1 Jun 2003 (UTC)

However he is still writing inaccurate gibberish, see his edits on Conflict (band) which I believe he started as a new article less than an hour ago and I've had to go and clear up. quercus robur 20:24 1 Jun 2003 (UTC)

The Michael edits seem to be at "Conflict" history. -- Infrogmation 21:39 1 Jun 2003 (UTC)

Or I guess you were refering to a deleted older version of Conflict (band). I undeleted it so his old edits will be viewable in history. -- Infrogmation 21:49 1 Jun 2003 (UTC)

Michael, if you want to make contributions here that aren't reverted or deleted, you need to take care of getting yourself unbanned FIRST. Clear enough? -- Infrogmation 22:03 1 Jun 2003 (UTC)

Uh-huh! I hear you! -- Michael

Obviously not. You continue to make edits. I will now ban this account. --Eloquence 22:07 1 Jun 2003 (UTC)