Talk:Michael Ignatieff/Comments

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The edit warning at the top of Talk:Michael Ignatieff applies equally here and to any other editing related to Michael Ignatieff. Tyrenius 12:11, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

At present, the neutrality of this article is disputed. While it is a decent overview of Ignatieff's life, writings, and political career, a serious student would find much to be desired. Thus, I would classify it as B grade, working towards a GA grade. Because it is about an important Canadian politician (and international scholar), I would classify the article as being of High importance. A cynic could make the argument for Mid level importance. Specific suggestions for improving the article include proper wikification of references and links, as well as cleaning up instances of pro- and anti- Ignatieff wording. Undue weight is also an issue, as is length. Additional comments to follow. -- 198.20.40.50 20:08, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] F-

This article rates an F for failure in every possible way. It has been continually censored and controlled by contributors who only want to maximize anything positive about the subject and minimize or delete anything negative. The most prolific current contributer even resorted to using offensive templates which ridicule disabled children as a way to pressure editors in his direction. Now that same editor and 1 other delete talk page discussion topics they do not want to see addressed by the community. In short, this article sucks,big time and at this point has been completely hijacked by contributors with a pro-Ignatieff pov who are blatantly instilling that pov into the article. Ottawaman 00:32, 11 August 2006 (UTC)